Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HERGERT Benito | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 2 | HEALY Griffen | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | LIAO Alex J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | HEWES Thomas G. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | HO Ryan J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 6 | CARMAN Ian K. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | XIE Javah | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 8 | MACRAE Harrison A. | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 9 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 10 | KWON Ethan | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | BOBROW Logan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | WANG Michael | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 13 | LE Vyn A. | V V V D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | HOWARD Michael | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 16 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | D D D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 17 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V D V V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 18 | TSAI Max W. | D V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | PYO Michael M. | V D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | HILMER Michael | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | FRITZ Ayden R. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 23 | GRAHAM Aleko | V V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | BOISLARD Adam J. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 25 | TSAI Philip W. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | MONTALBINE Aidan | V D D V D V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 27 | MEYERS Lee P. | V V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | MILLER Andrew | D D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | BAE Kevin | D D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 32 | HAN Lawrence | D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | NECECKAS Lucas | V V D V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 34 | WERWA Griffith | V D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 35 | HOWARD Alexander | D V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 36 | HUDSON Jonathan R. | V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 37 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 38 | COLARUSSO Michael A. | D V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 39 | CAI Oliver K. | D D D D V V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 40 | WALOR Owen T. | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 41 | KIM Juni C. | D D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 42 | BOOTSMA Shawn-Ryan V. | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 43 | FU Yifan | V D D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 44 | ZHAO Jesse | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | AMRANI David | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | MURPHY Damian J. | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 47 | GRASSIE James | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 48 | ALIMI Yacine A. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 48 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 50 | PICARD Justin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 51 | BELLUOMO David C. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 52 | CONNELL 3rd James | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 53 | CHEN Matthew | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.