Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVID Maxime | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 2 | HOLMES Andrew E. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 3 | HOLMES Stuart S. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 3 | TUMMINGS C.J. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 6 | LUTAR Lucas N. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 7 | KATAYAMA Kevin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 8 | DUBE Charles-Hugo | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 10 | KENNARD M Henry B. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
| 11 | DIVENTI Paul W. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | PRILUTSKY David B. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
| 13 | ADLER Ian B. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 15 | SIEGEL Elliot | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 16 | YU Vinni | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 17 | MA Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 18 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 19 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 21 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% |
| 22 | HEMPE Jake | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 23 | HARTMARK Anders | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | WU Albert | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 27 | JANG Jaewon | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 28 | MILLER Trent D. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LEE Daniel C. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 31 | BADRIGIAN William H. | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | HEALY Griffen | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 33 | LIN Richard W. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 34 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | PETER Griffin | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 36 | WEISS Barrett A. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | CARMAN Ian K. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | STANLEY Mason B. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | BOBROW Logan | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 41 | CAI Oliver K. | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | GROSS Liran | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 38% | 22% |
| 44 | ADLER David R. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 45 | DULA Patrik L. | 5% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LIU Kevin B. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 47 | HO Ryan J. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | RICCIO Frank J. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | GEE Brandon | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 50 | FU Samuel Y. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | GU Jeffrey | 1% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 55 | FU Yifan | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | PUGLISI Will | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 59 | SINGH Dayaal | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 60 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 2% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | WANG Michael | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 62 | SCHULTES Evans | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LEVESQUE Louis | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 64 | HEWES Thomas G. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | MILLER Andrew | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | HILMER Michael | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 67 | ZHAO Jesse | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | WANG William | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.