The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

March NAC

Y-12 Women's Saber

Friday, March 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM

Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 WIGGERS Susan Q. V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.8 6 +1.2
2 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
3 ALCEBAR Kayla D V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
5 FANG Victoria W. V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
6 YANG Ashley M. V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
7 PAUL Lila V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
8 SINHA Anika V V D D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
9 MIKA Veronica V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
10 ROMAGNOLI Isabella V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
11 MAREK SOFIA V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
12 ENGELMAN Madeline A. V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
13 BEVACQUA Aria F. V V D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
14 SHEARER Natalie E. D V V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
15 DUBOIS Lauren N. V V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
16 KONG Carys H. V D V V V D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
17 SOURIMTO Valeria V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
18 GUTHIKONDA Sunanya D V V V V V V D 2.4 5 +2.6
19 CHIN Sophia J. V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
20 LI Amanda C. V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
21 NATHANSON Samantha E. V V V V D D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
22 ANDRES Charmaine G. V D V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
23 WANG Zidan D V V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
24 CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. D V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
25 LU Elaine V V D D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
26 HERRERA Fernanda V D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
27 SHI Cathleen V D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
28 KRASTEV Minna D D V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
29 GRAFF Sophie V D V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
30 DUCKETT Madison V V D D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
31 ANTHONY Alexia B. D D V D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
32 LEE Sophia D V D D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
33 KIM Marley I. V V V D D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
34 WEI Vivian W. V V V V D D D 3.7 4 +0.3
35 PASHIN Anna D V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
36 YANG Angelina V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
37 YUAN Greta D V V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
38 HILD Nisha V D V V D D D 3.0 3 -
39 NG Sarah W. D V V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
40 HWANG Gabriela M. D D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
41 OBRADOVIC Ana V D D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
42 BURCH Keona Y. V D D D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
43 MURRAY Audrey A. D V V D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
44 GOMES Diana C. V V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
45 KER Grace V D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
46 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V D V D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
47 OGANEZOVA Valerie D D D D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
48 JOHNSON Dagny L. V D D V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
49 YUN Emma V D V D D D D 2.0 2 -
50 YOUNG Audrey V D D D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
51 HUANG Caroline D D V V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
52 WU Helen D D V D V D D 0.4 2 +1.6
53 BALAKUMARAN Maya D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
54 HUNG Anna V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
55 YAM Danika D D D V D D 3.8 1 -2.8
56 DIECK Miranda P. D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
57 PANIGRAHI Kingsley D D V D D V D 1.0 1 -
58 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA D D D V D V D 1.0 1 -
59 DONG Angel D D D V D V D 1.0 1 -
60 MONTORIO Lily M. V D D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
61 TREACY Aisling D V D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
62 ZHOU AnJi Angela V D D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
63 ELNATAN Mica A. D D D D D V V D 1.5 1 -0.5
64 SHINCHUK Ellisha D D D D D V D 0.5 0 -0.5
65 YOUNG Charlotte G. D D D V D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
66 LIN Sophia D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
67 MORROW Elsha D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
68 WILMORE Claire D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
69 DONDERIS Katherine D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
70 BINNING Skylar D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
71 DRAPER Audrey D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
72 BULLARD Neha D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.