Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HONDA Kazu Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 62% |
| 2 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 3 | MARTOS Jimmy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | |
| 3 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | |
| 5 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | |
| 6 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | |
| 7 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 8 | MCCORD Clark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 9 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 19% |
| 10 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 11 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
| 12 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 13 | LI Jiaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 14 | HAN Andersen Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 7% | - |
| 15 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 16 | GHAZALI Omer | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MURRAY Maximo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 18 | TSAI Philip W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 19 | JIN Honggu | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | WITTENBERG Jackson H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 21 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | LI James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 23 | CHEN Jr. William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 24 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
| 25 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 26 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 27 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 29 | WU Jerry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 30 | ESTEVES Dionel L. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 32 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 33 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 7% |
| 34 | DROUTMAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 36 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 37 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 38 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 40 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 42 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 43 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
| 44 | RILEY Brad | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 45 | FONG Colin J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | DESOLA Damian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 47 | CHREKY Jacob D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 47 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 49 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 51 | SCHECHTER Nathan L. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GU Hubert | 100% | 91% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | SONG Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 55 | OBERYSZYN Evan | 100% | 83% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 57 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 58 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
| 59 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 60 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 61 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | VLACK Felix | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | FU Yifan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 65 | LO Hung Yui | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 66 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 67 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | BLOCK William J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | FRATIAN Mihai | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | PIERCE Logan | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | CHEUNG Kevin | 100% | 83% | 38% | 6% | - | - | |
| 74 | CLAVIJO-GOMEZ Santiago A. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | DONDERIS AJ | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 76 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | ZHANG Thales | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 91% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.