Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 2 | CHANG Emily | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% |
| 5 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% |
| 6 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 7 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% |
| 8 | TAO Hannah J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 10 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 11 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 12 | KOO Samantha | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
| 13 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 14 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 16 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 10% |
| 18 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 32% | 5% |
| 19 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 20 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 21 | CHIOLDI Mina | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 22 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 3% |
| 24 | WU Cici | 5% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 26 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
| 27 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 4% |
| 29 | LIAO Siwen | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 30 | JIN Olivia P. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 31 | HILD Nisha | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | SU Emma | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% | |
| 34 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% |
| 35 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 8% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | FAY Zoe A. | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 37 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 28% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | NI Sharon | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 3% | 22% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 42 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | SHIH Christina | 5% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | IQBAL Sulphia | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 22% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | NGUYEN Ella | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | ILYIN Anna | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | CHIANG Emily | 5% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | CHIANG Sydney | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | CHU Laura | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GOEL Ishita | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIGH Karis | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Jianning | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | SINHA Anika | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 57 | KOTSEN Ava L. | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | CRUZ Sonia | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 22% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 61 | CHINTA Ritika | 33% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.