Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHARMA Sanil | D D V D V V | V V V V V V | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 2 | MUN Michael K. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V D V D D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | NG Alexander M. | D D V V D D | V V V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 5 | LEE Ryan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | LEVY Zachari I. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | MIELE Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 8 | WEI Zikun | V V D V D | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | CANDELA Nicholas | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 10 | LIN Ryan | V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | ALAIMO Charles | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | ZHU Wilson | V D V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | JEONG Connor | D V D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | DAO Matthew M. | D D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 17 | DINGMAN Spencer | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 18 | MAENG Jake W. | D V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | WANG Nathan | D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 20 | MANGELSDORF Anacan | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | COMER Daniel T. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | MILAM Hugh | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 24 | SCHENCK Theo | V V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 25 | MOORE Thomas J. | V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | LIANG Aaron | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 27 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 28 | WILKENS Zach Q. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 29 | CHU Anthony | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 30 | LEE Matthew C. | D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | JUNG Alexander | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 32 | ZHOU Alec Q. | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | KOSLU Aidan D. | D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 34 | SHOURIE Jai | D V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | MENDOZA Zachari | V D V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 36 | WELLS Tommy R. | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 37 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 38 | ZHU Max | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 39 | ELMER Timothy H. | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 40 | KIM Sterling S. | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 41 | HARRIS Roark S. | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | USHER Alexander | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | SOLTER Kai | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 44 | AHN Gus | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 45 | KAJI Ty | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 46 | ROMERO Caleb E. | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 47 | POCSVEILER Magor | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | LILLIAN Francis (Alex) (Alex) A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 49 | ARABACI Jack A. | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 50 | BORLAND Isaac | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 51 | CHUNG Thomas | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 52 | EASTMAN Blake C. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.