The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

NEUSFA 2019 Pomme De Terre Individual

Senior Men's Foil

Sunday, June 16, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HODGES Carter F. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.8 6 +0.2
2 WELCH Kyle J. V D V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 YANG Adam V V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
3 ZHANG Daniel D. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
5 ANDRADE Nicholas V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
6 LIU Niles J. V V V V D V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
7 IBRAHIM Marwan V V D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
8 HOLMES Andrew E. V V D V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
9 HOLMES Stuart S. V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
10 LI Brian H. V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
10 EMMER Chase T. V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
12 HAN YiMing V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
13 KOECK Tomas E. V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
14 HUANG Bin V V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
15 SLEDESKI Andrew V D V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
16 ZUSIN Zachary W. V V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
17 WANG Brian S. V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
18 BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
19 HAMILTON Bogdan A. V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
19 PRINCE Nicholas J. V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
21 SULLIVAN Jackson R. V V V V V D V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 RITCHIE Luke W. V V V V D V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
23 CHENG Thomas C. V V V V D V V D 5.0 5 -
24 HEWES Thomas V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
25 LI Brandon V D D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
26 ANDREWS Nathan J. D V V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
27 DING Allan D V V D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
27 ACINAPURO Philip M. D V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
30 LUTAR Lucas N. V V V D D V V V D 5.4 4 -1.4
31 GEE Brandon V D D V V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
32 BADRIGIAN William H. V D D V D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
33 PETER Griffin V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
34 ADLER David R. V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
35 LIU Patrick V D V V D V D 5.2 4 -1.2
36 SCHENCK Koen M. V V V D V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
37 MA Alexander D V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
38 CRALEY Thomas D V V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
38 MCGILLION-MOORE Jake D V V V D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
40 DOBBINS Evan V V D V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
41 STANLEY Mason B. D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
42 LIU Jonathan D V V V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 BREIER Matthew F. V V D V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
45 CORTIZAS Jack V D D V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
46 SEAH Chad V D V V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
47 LE Vyn A. V D V V D V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
48 DING Jonathan D D V V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
49 LIN Richard W. D V V D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
50 LIU Kevin D V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
51 COSTELLO Chaissen F. V V D D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
52 MELCHER Jack H. V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
52 JIMENEZ Diran D V V D V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
54 BROOKES Scott L. V D V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
54 LAROSEE Matthew D. V D V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
56 BATRAK Alexander D V V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
57 SIEGEL Elliot D V D V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
59 KAZA Nitish D D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
60 LIU Eric P. V D D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
61 CHESTNA Sam V D V D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
62 KASI Sanjay V V D D D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
63 HU Oliver W. D V D V D D V D 4.6 2 -2.6
64 HU Robin V D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
65 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. D V V V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
66 ZHOU Timmy V D D V V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
67 MILLER Andrew V V V D D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
68 YE Kevin E. V V D D V D D 1.4 3 +1.6
69 SHA Yi Peng D D V V V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
70 HOWELL Thomas A. D V V D V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
71 ARTIS Tre D. V D V V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
72 MOO Gareth G. D D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
73 DU Samuel R. D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
75 MARSHALL Ian D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
76 SANTULLI Tristan D V D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
77 MILLER Trent D. D D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
78 BICKFORD Michael D D V D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
79 FU Yifan D V D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
80 SHIN Joshua J. V V D D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
81 TSAI Philip W. D D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
82 SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. D D V V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
83 BRINTON III Robert H. V D D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
84 AHN Andrew D D V D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
85 LIGH Thomas D D D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
86 WOHLERS Casey D D D V D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
87 VARGAS Hector W. D D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
88 BANKS Alexander S. D V D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
88 TSAI Max W. D D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
90 IVARSSON Oliver D D D D V D D 3.2 1 -2.2
91 WITTENBERG Jackson H. D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
92 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
93 BOISLARD Adam J. D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
94 HOWARD Alexander V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
95 ALIMI Yacine A. D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
96 ZHAO Jesse D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
97 FERNANDEZ-PRADA Kenneth (Ken) D. D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
98 QI Steve D D D D D V 0.6 1 +0.4
99 LIGH Jack D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
100 WILBERT Matt V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
101 CAMAYO-ROSERO Andres Camilo D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
102 HONDOR Robert D. D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
102 SPOSATO Luke D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
104 HOWARD Michael D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
105 CHU Tristan L. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
106 WIEST Henry D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
107 WANG Jonathan D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
107 JIN Dennis H. D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
109 ROTHCHILD Matthew D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
110 ROADY Tyler J. D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
110 GUO Hairuo D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.