The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, November 23, 2018 at 8:15 AM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ZHANG Daniel D. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.0 6 +1.0
2 KIM Nicholas W. V D V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
3 YU Vinni V V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
3 LEE Caden V V D V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
5 WONG Adam L. V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
6 CHOI Jiwoo J. V V V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
7 ZUSIN Zachary W. V V D V V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
8 WAN Jason D V D V D V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
9 SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
10 TORO Alejandro V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
11 MCCLAIN Bryce C. V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
12 LOCKWOOD Owen V V V V D V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
13 TSAI Philip W. V V V D V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
14 BOBROW Logan V D V D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
15 KASI Sanjay D V D V V V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
16 LEE Daniel C. V D V V D D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
17 ZHANG Henry C. D V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
18 MA Alexander V V V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
19 HOOSHI Dylan M. V V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
20 LIANG Lixi (Henry) D V V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
21 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
22 CHENG Jonathan V V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
23 CHENG Thomas C. V V D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
23 WU Nicholas V V V D D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
25 PELOSKY Zack B. D V D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
26 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) D D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
27 DOCTOR Aidan L. D D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
28 JEON Caleb A. V D V D D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
29 LIAO Alex J. V V V D D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
30 FU Samuel Y. V D D V D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
31 SHIKHMAN Robert D D D D V V V D 2.2 1 -1.2
32 BAS Liam V D D D D V V D 3.3 1 -2.3
33 DESERANNO Jeidus V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
34 BREIER Matthew F. V V V V V D 2.4 5 +2.6
34 ZHANG Andy W. V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
36 PRILUTSKY David B. V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
37 SCHENCK Koen M. V V V V V D D 4.3 5 +0.7
38 ONIK Elijah T. V V V V D V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
40 FINN Mark T. V V D V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
41 PAE Jonathan L. V D V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
42 JANG Jaewon D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
43 BING Charles V V V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
44 HU Robin V V V V D D V D 4.9 4 -0.9
45 KIM Yonjae D V D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
46 VASILIEV Sacha M. V V V V D D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
47 DEGREMONT Henri S. V V D V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
48 FUKUDA Alessio R. D V D V V V D 1.4 4 +2.6
49 ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. D D V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
50 GALLUCCI Charles John V V D V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
51 PARK Ryan V V D D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
52 FUKUDA Renzo K. D V V V D V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
53 GEE Brandon V D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
53 TIAN Aaron C. V V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
55 CHAN Tyler V V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
56 MACRAE Harrison A. V D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 ORTIZ Zachary M. V V D D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
58 LIU Kevin B. V V D D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
59 OURSLER Jack V D D V V D V D 5.2 3 -2.2
60 MARX Oscar L. D V V V D D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
61 ZELTSER Lawrence M. D V D V V D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
62 REZNICK Nicholas J. D D V V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
63 SINGH Dayaal V V D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
64 FU Yifan D D D D V V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
65 LI Yulei D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
66 YEROKHIN Michael N. D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
68 NAGER Noah V D V D V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
70 PYO Michael M. D D V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
71 KEE Andrew L. V V D V D D D 2.4 3 +0.6
72 SHA Yi Peng V D V D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
73 HUTTENBACH Koren A. D V V D V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
74 ALIMI Yacine A. D D V V V D D 1.0 3 +2.0
75 COSTELLO Chaissen F. V D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
76 HOOSHI Jayden C. D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
77 BAE Kevin V D D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
78 DU Samuel R. D V D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
79 KAO Castor T. D D D V D V D 4.7 2 -2.7
80 TSAI Max W. D D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
81 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson D V D D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
82 YULDASHEV Timur V D D V D D D 2.0 2 -
83 ALONSOZANA Luke D D D V V D D 2.0 2 -
84 SPOSATO Luke B. D V D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
85 KOLKER Gregory A. D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
86 MUNDAHL Brandon D. D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
87 HAN Lawrence V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
88 MAHNKEN Thomas P. D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
89 LIN Dennis D D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
90 BANERJEE Anup D D D D D V D 3.5 1 -2.5
91 LE Vyn A. D D D D V D 3.3 1 -2.3
92 DAI Jonathan T. D V D D D D D 3.4 1 -2.4
93 PAE Brian L. V D D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
94 KWON Ethan D V D D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
95 GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas D D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
96 ARANA Massimo D D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 PAN Eric V D D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
98 ANTONIO Marcky C. D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
99 KIZHNER Fillip D V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
99 MUNDAHL Morgan K. D D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
101 MAISONNEUVE Alexis V D D D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
102 WANG Gerald Y. V D D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
103 QI Steve D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
104 JIN Dennis H. D D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
105 ZHONG Guoren D D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
106 CAI Oliver K. D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
107 WEI William D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
108 SONG Leonardo T. D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
108 WERWA Griffith D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
110 TOMRUK Batu D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
111 ZHANG Evan D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
111 ZHAO Jesse D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
113 YOST Jacob A. D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
114 MOROZE Daniel D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.