The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Capitol Clash SYC & RCC with Non-Regional Veteran and Y8

Cadet Women's Épée

Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 12:30 PM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HUSISIAN Hadley N. - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
2 PARK Faith K. - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
3 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
3 JOYCE Michaela - - - - 3% 27% 70%
5 YERMOLENKO Liza - - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
6 TYLER Syd - - 1% 9% 34% 42% 14%
7 SMITH Grace L. - - 2% 16% 41% 33% 8%
8 PATURU Meghana - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
9 GU Sarah - - 9% 30% 38% 20% 4%
10 DING Jiahe (Heidi) - - - 4% 20% 42% 33%
11 HENRY Asha S. - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
12 MUCSI Angela Lilla - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
13 ZHU Heidi - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
14 PALMER Amelia C. 2% 15% 42% 33% 8% 1% -
15 CHAN Elizabeth - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
16 KIM Diane E. - - 2% 14% 35% 36% 13%
17 DESAMOURS Sabine I. - 1% 10% 31% 37% 19% 3%
18 WATRALL Christina - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
19 GABERKORN Nadia - - 1% 9% 30% 41% 19%
20 WU Fan - 2% 14% 35% 33% 13% 2%
21 PYO Yunice - - 7% 27% 39% 23% 5%
22 DE JAGER Celine 8% 31% 39% 19% 4% < 1% -
23 KIM Caroline 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
24 MEHROTRA Anya - - 4% 19% 38% 31% 9%
25 LEUNG Natalie - - 5% 25% 41% 25% 4%
26 CHENG Ava - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
27 LONG Cindy - - 3% 17% 40% 35% 6%
28 TOLBA Salma 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
29 LEE kyungmin - 1% 7% 30% 40% 19% 2%
30 NING Emma - 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 5%
31 SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) - - 2% 14% 34% 36% 14%
32 MAO Amy 3% 28% 43% 21% 5% - -
33 ZUHARS Renee A. - - 1% 9% 30% 40% 19%
33 CHU Audrey - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
35 MUCSI Anna M. - 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 2%
36 DESAI Meera P. - 7% 24% 36% 24% 8% 1%
37 CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) - - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
38 GUMAGAY Erika L. - 5% 20% 37% 28% 9% 1%
39 ZHANG Tina - 1% 6% 24% 40% 25% 4%
40 REITINGER Emilie B. - 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% -
41 LEE Michelle - 3% 15% 35% 36% 12%
42 GAO Judy 4% 21% 37% 27% 9% 1%
43 REID Sobia - 5% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
44 CHERNYSHOVA Victoria - 1% 11% 32% 36% 18% 3%
45 CHAWLA Ishika 2% 15% 36% 33% 12% 1% -
46 CHIN Isabella - - 2% 12% 34% 41% 12%
47 KUZNETSOV Victoria - - 8% 29% 38% 21% 4%
48 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) - 1% 16% 36% 32% 12% 2%
49 ZHAO Yingying 2% 15% 37% 33% 12% 2% -
50 WU ALLYSON 21% 44% 28% 6% 1% - -
51 EBRAHIM Ameera H. - 6% 29% 42% 19% 3% -
52 TONG Sarah Shen - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
53 KIM Erika S. 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
54 PALANSKI Cate - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
55 LEE Olive - 5% 33% 39% 18% 4% -
56 BELAOUSSOFF Kira - 1% 9% 28% 39% 20% 3%
57 MATHEZ-PELLERIN Amanda - 3% 18% 37% 32% 9% -
58 KIM Elizabeth Y. 1% 9% 28% 35% 20% 6% 1%
59 PAYNE Elizabeth 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
60 SHEN Stephanie 1% 12% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
61 CHOI Yuni D. 21% 41% 28% 8% 1% -
62 RUNIONS Emersyn - 1% 7% 27% 41% 22% 3%
63 OSTROVSKY Emily I. 25% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
64 BAJAJ Nikita K. 15% 41% 32% 11% 2% - -
65 BLIN Margaux J. 8% 33% 40% 16% 3% - -
66 WAGMAN Agatha E. 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
68 NAYAK Mira 20% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
69 ZENG Katrina 32% 43% 21% 4% - - -
70 ELLENT Isabella S. 3% 30% 42% 20% 4% - -
71 DILLE Carolina G. 19% 58% 20% 3% - - -
72 MING Cynthia 27% 46% 23% 4% - - -
73 LEE Anna 31% 49% 18% 2% - - -
74 VALLURI Rithi H. 72% 25% 3% - - - -
75 DREFKE Sigrid 26% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
76 MCLAREN Rachel 20% 62% 16% 2% - - -
77 XU Jessica 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
78 FLO Sena 36% 47% 15% 2% - - -
79 GLICK Nina 31% 45% 20% 3% - - -
80 RAI Ananya 36% 47% 15% 2% - - -
81 OHL Emily 71% 28% 1% - - - -
82 KABRHEL Sadie 25% 50% 21% 4% - - -
83 MACEDON Gianna 72% 28% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.