San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GARRETT Samuel | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 2 | DUONG Enoch | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 3 | KUO Elvin | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 3 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 5 | AU Marcus J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 6 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 7 | CHU Allan | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Alec | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 9 | UZGIRIS Kovas | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 10 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 11 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 12 | PALLI Maximillian | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 13 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | KATZ Matheo | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LIU Andrew | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 16 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | MALEEV Georgy | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 18 | BAGCHI Aritra | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 19 | MCGOWAN Gavin | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | ARANA FANTOZZI Rigel | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | LIANG derek | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | LAU Matthew | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | BHAVANASI Atharv | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GUPTA Karan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 26 | ARUN Madhav | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.