Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 2 | WONG Adrian | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
| 3 | MARX Jackson L. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% | |
| 3 | XU Jia Bao | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 5 | LIU Derek | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 6 | TANG Alexander L. | - | - | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% |
| 7 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
| 8 | GUO Justin | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 9 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 10 | YANG Luao | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 11 | TANG Albert | 5% | 32% | 47% | 14% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 12 | TANG August L. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 2% |
| 13 | LIN James G. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 14 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
| 15 | AROUH Dylan | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 16 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
| 17 | XU Andy P. | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | CHENG Ethan | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | XU Ethan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 20 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 22 | XIE Brandon | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 23 | XIAO Benjamin | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | DONG Quintin | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 25 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 26 | YU Jason | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | CHEN Kyle P. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 28 | TANG Owen S. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | MATSAKH Philip | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | LI Aaron | 3% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SHIM Peter S. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 32 | SHAO Eric | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 33 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% | |
| 34 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
| 35 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | LI Matthew | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | BOBROW Silas | 3% | 27% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | GERRISH William | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 3% | 14% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 42 | LEE Brendan | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | YAO Bradley | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | SENIC Lucas | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | SIMON Luke | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | HAN Jinu | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | MALHAM Andrew | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | HONG Logan | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | JURMAN Therin | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | ZHENG Leon | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | TAN Aidan | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | WONG Jackson | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SALDANHA Rafael | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | NG Micah | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | RAYKIN Gabriel | 13% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | BOSCO-SCHMIDT Tyler | 27% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | GOFMAN Robert | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | HUANG Eythan | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | TANG Terry | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.