Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 2 | LEE Michelle J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 3 | LIU Christina A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 3 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 5 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 6 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 7 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 8 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 9 | KOKES Ava | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 36% | 5% |
| 10 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 12 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | LEACH Meka A. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% |
| 15 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 16 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | HESS Heidi J. | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 18 | YAO KATHARINE | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | DANIEL Olivia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% |
| 20 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 21 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | BARRETT Elisabeth | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | YU Bailey | 8% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | BUSH emma | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | LE Jennifer | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | MIRZA Annoshae | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 30 | LEE Olivia | 8% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | SUN Ruilin | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 32 | BARBARA Camille | < 1% | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | MACEDON Gianna | 52% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 34 | YERIAN Ayda | 2% | 17% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KORKIN Alice | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | LUNSFORD Ariana J. | 30% | 47% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | SWECKARD Sophia | 23% | 53% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ELLENT Victoria R. | 43% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | GADDE Neha | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | MADHEKAR Krishita | 75% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.