The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Women's Saber

Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FOUR-GARCIA Madison - - 1% 8% 28% 44% 20%
2 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. - - 4% 18% 37% 33% 8%
3 RIZKALA Joanna - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 20%
3 WIGGERS Susan Q. - 2% 13% 41% 39% 7%
5 LI Amanda C. - - 2% 13% 36% 37% 12%
6 PAK Kaitlyn - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
7 GORMAN Victoria M. - - 5% 23% 39% 27% 5%
8 FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. - 2% 16% 39% 34% 9%
9 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn - - - 1% 11% 39% 48%
10 CARVALHO Isabela A. - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 11%
11 ENGELMAN Madeline A. - - - 1% 12% 44% 42%
12 CHEN Erica - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
13 WEINBERG Alexandra L. - - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
14 ATLURI Sara V. 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3%
15 LEVITIS Danielle - 5% 20% 35% 28% 11% 1%
16 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. 6% 36% 40% 16% 2% -
17 CHANG Emily - - 5% 24% 43% 26%
18 SCHMITT Alana P. - 4% 17% 35% 31% 11% 1%
19 CANNON Sophia E. - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
20 SINHA Anika - - 1% 9% 28% 40% 21%
21 SHOMAN Jenna - - - 4% 28% 68%
22 TAO Hannah J. - - - 6% 24% 44% 26%
23 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. - - - 5% 21% 42% 31%
24 CHIOLDI Mina 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 6% -
25 NEIBART Fiona - 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
26 YURT Leyla - 2% 12% 33% 36% 16% 2%
27 CHEN Xinyan 1% 9% 28% 37% 22% 5%
28 KOO Samantha - 3% 18% 38% 32% 9%
29 SADOVA Olga 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
30 LUKASHENKO Angelina - 1% 8% 27% 40% 21% 3%
31 SATHYANATH Kailing 1% 7% 25% 37% 25% 6%
32 ZHIZHIN Jeanette 15% 46% 30% 8% 1% - -
33 DEPEW Charlotte R. 8% 30% 37% 19% 5% < 1% -
35 SHOMAN Miriam - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
36 PRIEUR Lauren 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
37 GRINBERG Aliya 1% 17% 38% 32% 11% 1% -
38 BOIS Adele 1% 10% 35% 36% 15% 3% -
39 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika - - 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
40 FAY Zoe A. 26% 44% 24% 6% 1% -
41 HU Allison C. 17% 44% 31% 8% 1% -
42 O'HARA Eimile J. 1% 8% 32% 38% 18% 3%
43 LIGH Karis 46% 41% 12% 1% - -
44 IQBAL Sulphia 23% 54% 21% 3% - -
45 KRYLOVA Valery - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
46 SPORN Melanie 2% 19% 38% 30% 10% 2% -
47 SU Emma 1% 7% 21% 33% 27% 10% 1%
48 HAN Lauren - 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1%
49 NI Sharon 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 3% -
50 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) - 1% 10% 28% 37% 21% 3%
51 FU Linqian (Helen) 2% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
52 WANG Jianning 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
53 BAKER Audrey C. - 7% 28% 39% 21% 5% -
54 LIAO Siwen - 5% 24% 43% 24% 2%
56 HAQ Nylah 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
57 MEYTIN Sophia E. 57% 36% 7% 1% - - -
58 BHOGAL Sukhleen 11% 41% 36% 11% 1% - -
59 JIN Olivia P. 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
59 PAONE Karina K. 2% 21% 41% 28% 7% 1% -
61 KOTSEN Ava L. 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
62 ELDER Rhiannon C. 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
63 LIN Selena 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
64 MU Vicki Y. 7% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
65 MADA Skye 54% 38% 7% 1% - - -
66 XU Jenny 11% 40% 39% 9% 1% -
67 FAUSTINO Emily 76% 22% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.