The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Premier Winter RYC/RCC Tournament

Y-12 Men's Foil

Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 11:30 AM

Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHENG Jonathan - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
2 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
3 MARX Oscar L. - - - 2% 15% 50% 33%
3 GEOGHEGAN Ronan - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
5 LI Owen - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
6 DOCTOR Aidan L. - - 1% 10% 39% 49%
7 LI Richard - - - - 7% 36% 57%
8 PAE Jonathan L. - - - 3% 19% 45% 32%
9 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - - 6% 33% 61%
10 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - 5% 26% 46% 22%
11 PAE Brian L. - - 2% 12% 32% 39% 16%
12 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 3% 16% 40% 41%
13 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - 2% 14% 46% 38%
14 AHN Jun - 1% 6% 20% 36% 29% 8%
15 BRUK Peter J. - - 2% 9% 28% 40% 21%
16 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 2% 18% 43% 29% 7% -
17 ANTON Nathaniel - - 1% 9% 34% 44% 12%
18 TOLBA Abdelrahman - - 2% 11% 34% 42% 11%
19 ORVANANOS Jorge - 1% 14% 40% 37% 8%
20 PO Oliver - 2% 14% 36% 36% 11%
21 MARX Jackson L. - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
22 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - - 7% 29% 43% 19% 2%
23 GUO Sean - 3% 15% 32% 33% 14% 2%
24 LI Ayren 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
25 BASOK Nikita - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 2%
26 WU Alexander - 3% 19% 41% 30% 6%
27 ZHEN Ethan - - 4% 23% 43% 25% 4%
28 HONG Issac - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
29 JIANG Owen - 4% 19% 39% 32% 7% -
30 TORRES Treston 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
31 OTTO Nathaniel B. 1% 13% 44% 32% 9% 1% -
32 ACHILOV Sayid 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
33 LI Yao (Liam) - 4% 20% 41% 28% 7% -
34 LIN James G. - - 4% 21% 41% 29% 4%
35 PROMRAT Pete 1% 17% 38% 32% 11% 1% -
36 WANG Jackson 1% 10% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
37 XU Andy P. - - 3% 20% 42% 29% 4%
38 ZHOU Leon 6% 31% 44% 16% 2% - -
39 LI Aaron - 3% 20% 44% 28% 5% -
40 LI Jinghua E. 11% 33% 34% 17% 4% 1% -
41 SONG Bryan 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 5%
42 TRAUGOT Owen G. 7% 30% 39% 20% 4% -
43 CHEN Kyle P. - 3% 19% 42% 29% 7% 1%
44 TAHOUN Mostafa 2% 15% 36% 34% 12% 1% -
45 GUO Justin 4% 24% 40% 26% 6% - -
46 KNIZHNIK David 8% 41% 39% 12% 1% - -
47 ORLOV Dmitriy 15% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
48 MALHAM Andrew 23% 44% 26% 6% 1% - -
49 MENG Zhaoyi 3% 20% 40% 28% 8% 1%
50 PEDERSEN Charles 44% 41% 13% 2% - -
51 KOVACS Wyatt 31% 46% 20% 3% - -
52 MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. 22% 50% 24% 4% - - -
53 HESS Jason 1% 11% 31% 37% 17% 3% -
54 KLYCZEK Andrew 43% 40% 14% 2% - - -
55 XU Ethan 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
55 TIKHAEV Alexander 11% 37% 36% 14% 2% - -
57 KLOTZ Isaiah 10% 31% 35% 18% 4% - -
58 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 9% 32% 37% 18% 3% - -
58 LIU Derek - 4% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
60 WANG mason 20% 40% 29% 9% 1% - -
61 XIANG Derrick 3% 18% 34% 30% 13% 3% -
62 LEE Jonah 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
63 LIEW Jeremy K. 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
64 ZHANG zican 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -
65 WANG Julang 16% 42% 34% 8% 1% - -
66 CHOO Christopher Y. 30% 49% 18% 2% - -
67 LIU Ryan 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
68 SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. 53% 41% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.