Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, November 29, 2019 at 8:15 AM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIN Richard W. - - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
2 CHOI Jiwoo J. - - - - - 12% 87%
3 ARIZA Isaac A. - - - 3% 15% 41% 41%
3 KAO Castor T. - - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13%
5 ONIK Elijah T. - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
6 LEE Joshua - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
7 MARX Oscar L. - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 18%
8 NAGER Noah - - 1% 9% 45% 42% 3%
9 CHENG Jonathan - - - 4% 22% 45% 29%
10 PELOSKY Zack B. - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
11 PAE Jonathan L. - - 4% 23% 40% 27% 6%
12 BAS Liam - - 4% 15% 32% 35% 15%
12 YANG Luao - - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
14 REZNICK Nicholas J. - - 3% 17% 37% 33% 10%
15 LEE Aidan - 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 8%
16 SHIKHMAN Robert 1% 6% 24% 39% 25% 5%
17 PAN Eric - 3% 15% 31% 33% 16% 2%
18 ZELTSER Lawrence M. - 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8%
19 KWON Ethan - - 1% 10% 48% 39% 2%
20 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 4% 20% 43% 34%
21 FOGELSON Frederick J. - 2% 14% 36% 36% 12%
22 VERSTEELE Sander - 11% 35% 37% 16% 2%
23 PAE Brian L. - 3% 21% 39% 28% 9% 1%
24 ORVANANOS Jorge - 1% 8% 42% 37% 11% 1%
25 AHN Jun - - 3% 20% 39% 30% 8%
26 SHA Yi Peng - - 3% 16% 39% 34% 9%
27 HE Yuhao - 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2%
28 LI Eric - 2% 16% 36% 33% 12% 1%
29 GRAHAM Roy J. - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
30 FU Samuel Y. - - - 8% 33% 43% 16%
31 DOCTOR Aidan L. - - 7% 26% 39% 24% 4%
32 DESOLA Aidan J. 2% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
33 LI Richard - - 3% 18% 42% 36%
34 BING Charles - - 1% 12% 39% 37% 11%
35 WU Alexander - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
36 QI Steve 4% 20% 39% 28% 8% 1% -
37 ALIMI Yacine A. 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1%
38 PYO Michael M. - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 22%
39 LIU Eric Y. - 3% 16% 34% 32% 12% 1%
40 DORAN Wesley C. - 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 3%
41 MENG Zhaoyi 3% 16% 31% 30% 16% 4% -
42 ANTON Nathaniel - 1% 7% 28% 38% 21% 4%
43 KEE Andrew L. - - 3% 16% 38% 35% 9%
44 LOU Darren 7% 25% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
45 SHIN Joshua J. 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
46 LI Owen - 3% 20% 39% 30% 8%
47 SONG Leonardo T. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
47 TIAN Aaron C. - 1% 9% 29% 38% 20% 3%
49 KULKARNI Ansh A. - 5% 17% 31% 30% 14% 3%
49 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 11% 35% 37% 14% 2% -
51 GOOR Julian - 2% 10% 25% 34% 23% 6%
52 SHADPOOR Ryan 1% 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% -
53 LOUIE Timothy J. - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 8%
54 CAI Oliver K. - 7% 36% 39% 16% 3% -
55 VALENTON Timothy 4% 26% 44% 21% 4% - -
56 BRUK Peter J. - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
57 FINN Mark T. 21% 43% 27% 7% 1% -
58 YULDASHEV Timur 2% 26% 41% 23% 6% 1% -
59 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 12% 31% 33% 18% 5% 1% -
60 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 6% 24% 35% 24% 9% 2% -
61 ZHANG Yun Isaac - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
62 DOUGLAS Oscar M. - 2% 9% 24% 34% 24% 7%
63 HAN Lawrence 1% 32% 42% 20% 4% -
64 MILLER Aidan A. 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 6% -
65 TAHOUN Mostafa - 6% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
66 WANG Gerald Y. 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
67 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 1% 10% 31% 37% 17% 3% -
68 MCLENDON Diego 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
69 BROWN Alexander R. 1% 11% 36% 44% 9% - -
70 SCHALES Peyton 18% 45% 31% 5% - - -
71 LONGENBACH Pharell J. 30% 46% 20% 3% - - -
72 LI Matthew 2% 26% 43% 23% 5% 1% -
73 WERWA Griffith 29% 44% 21% 4% - -
74 GORBACHEV Alexander 1% 9% 30% 38% 20% 3%
75 DREW Nicolas 3% 25% 51% 19% 2% - -
76 KALIPERSAD Neil A. - 18% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
77 LU Xiao 27% 48% 23% 2% - - -
77 ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" 24% 58% 17% 2% - - -
79 ZHENG zhe 11% 32% 34% 17% 5% 1% -
80 ZHANG Huaxu 51% 39% 9% 1% - - -
81 ZHAI Jeffrey 1% 10% 25% 33% 22% 8% 1%
82 BAUMANN Gunnar 26% 46% 23% 4% - - -
82 THUMMALA Nishanth 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
84 RADTKE Jakob 73% 25% 2% - - - -
85 KNIZHNIK David 33% 43% 20% 4% - -
86 VISHNEVSKY Aden 94% 6% - - - - -
87 KANDADAI Arjun 33% 45% 19% 3% - - -
88 LI Lianhao 61% 35% 3% - - - -
89 DAS Nikhil 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
90 BADLANI Dev 15% 60% 22% 3% - - -
90 TORRES Treston 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
90 DONG sean 14% 46% 32% 7% 1% - -
93 IVANENKO Alex 96% 4% - - - -
94 BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel 21% 48% 28% 3% - - -
95 MECINSKI Henrik 78% 20% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.