The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Y-14 Women's Foil

Friday, November 29, 2019 at 12:00 PM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHANG Yunjia - - - - 4% 28% 68%
2 WANG Ellen - - 3% 18% 46% 33%
3 LUNG Katerina - - - 2% 15% 44% 38%
3 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - - 7% 37% 45% 10%
5 SHEN Lydia - - - 1% 12% 41% 45%
6 KIM Rachael - - - - 5% 29% 66%
7 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - - 2% 18% 44% 36%
8 CHEN Allison V. - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 23%
9 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - - - 7% 35% 58%
10 CHEN Jia P. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
11 SU Michelle - 2% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
12 WU Julianna Y. 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
13 LI Rachel Y. - - 4% 15% 33% 34% 14%
14 ZHANG Alina C. - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
14 JANG Kimberley - - 4% 22% 47% 26%
16 DE LA CRUZ Eden - 3% 17% 37% 33% 9%
17 YU Lauren C. - - 6% 28% 41% 21% 3%
18 EYER Hailey M. - - 1% 11% 36% 43% 8%
19 PEVZNER Victoria - - - - 5% 33% 62%
20 SHEN Sophia H. - - - - 4% 28% 68%
21 WANG Chloe - - 2% 14% 39% 37% 8%
22 CHEN Jessie S. - - 1% 10% 34% 41% 14%
23 HUANG Natalie - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
24 SHA Yi Ling - - 4% 20% 43% 29% 4%
25 MI Anning 1% 7% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
26 SEO Irene Y. - - 1% 15% 47% 32% 5%
27 WONG Sophia M. - - 2% 16% 40% 33% 8%
28 CHO Rebecca H. - - 2% 14% 36% 39% 9%
29 ORVANANOS Anice - 1% 8% 24% 38% 26% 4%
30 YU Jaime L. 1% 18% 46% 29% 6% -
31 SIMONOV Dasha - 6% 29% 43% 19% 2%
32 MI Aileen - - 9% 52% 33% 6% -
33 TOBIN Brean 7% 29% 37% 21% 5% < 1% -
34 LENZ Zoe N. 15% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
35 VOITENKO AGATA 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
36 KOKES Gwendolen - 3% 14% 31% 32% 16% 3%
37 LEE Lavender - - 2% 18% 40% 33% 7%
38 YAO Ada - 3% 17% 37% 32% 10% 1%
39 WILLIS Fletcher L. - 4% 22% 38% 28% 8% -
40 YU Nicole J. 1% 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1%
41 LIN Zhi tong - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 6%
42 WU Celine - 4% 18% 34% 30% 13% 2%
42 SOLDATOVA Maria 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6% -
44 WANG Jasmine - 4% 19% 39% 30% 7% -
45 LIU Sophia 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6% -
46 KULKARNI Sohah A. - 3% 13% 30% 33% 17% 3%
47 LIU Angel(Daying) - 1% 11% 31% 37% 18% 2%
48 RASO Olivia 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
49 SONG Yuqiao - 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
50 CHOW Annabelle 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
51 GOLBIN Ariella J. 2% 18% 40% 31% 8% 1% -
52 ZHENG Julie - 2% 19% 44% 28% 6% -
53 CHEN Jasmine 1% 15% 37% 34% 11% 1% -
54 ROY Layla - - 5% 28% 42% 22% 3%
55 LEE Kaitlyn 11% 54% 30% 5% - - -
56 HSIEH Sabrina 60% 34% 5% - - - -
57 FELLUS Talia E. 3% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1%
58 XIANG Emma 1% 10% 28% 37% 20% 4%
59 CHENG Angelina 23% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
60 FU Qihan 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% 1%
61 PAULUS Isabella 7% 37% 37% 15% 3% - -
62 CHARALEL Jessica 8% 31% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
63 SHMAY Anastasia 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 2% -
64 THIRUVENGADAM Harini 42% 41% 15% 3% - - -
65 MANIKTALA Prisha 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2% -
66 HOU Wendong 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
67 MARKOVSKY Nina 1% 16% 46% 30% 7% 1% -
68 LIN Victoria T. 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
69 LEE Samantha X. - 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
70 HSIEH Rebecca 7% 32% 41% 17% 3% - -
71 JIANG Claire 2% 21% 50% 23% 4% - -
72 LEE Carina 24% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
73 AO Alyssa 5% 39% 50% 6% - - -
74 RICHARD Dominique 5% 39% 39% 14% 2% -
75 ZHOU Sophia 64% 30% 5% - - - -
76 MARTIRE Alessandra 11% 50% 35% 4% - - -
77 LEVY Avery 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
78 DONG TianTian 38% 42% 17% 3% - - -
79 RICHARD Clara 6% 31% 39% 19% 4% - -
80 KIM Raiden 14% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
81 LAPPER Whitney P. 78% 21% 2% - - -
82 MATOS Lívia < 1% - 2% 12% 31% 39% 16%
83 NAIR Supriya 2% 18% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
84 KIES Daniela 17% 55% 25% 3% - - -
85 LEE DAYOUNG 74% 24% 2% - - - -
86 KUTTIKAT Sanjana 57% 35% 7% 1% - - -
87 SHAH Aanya 64% 30% 5% - - - -
88 ZHOU huiqi 68% 29% 3% - - - -
89 WANG Rachael 15% 42% 31% 10% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.