The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Women's Saber

Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 12:30 PM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SATHYANATH Kailing - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
2 NI Sharon - 1% 18% 41% 32% 8%
3 PRIEUR Lauren - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
3 ATLURI Sara V. - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 24%
5 MIKA Veronica - - - 2% 13% 41% 45%
6 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
7 ROMAGNOLI Isabella - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 17%
8 WEBER Juliana I. - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
9 WIGGERS Susan Q. - - 1% 6% 25% 42% 26%
9 ENGELMAN Madeline A. - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 29%
11 GORMAN Victoria M. - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
12 KOO Samantha - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
12 TAO Hannah J. - - - 4% 20% 42% 33%
14 YANG Ashley M. - 1% 7% 28% 44% 20%
15 HILD Nisha - - 3% 17% 38% 33% 8%
16 PAUL Lila - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 13%
17 CARVALHO Isabela A. - - - 1% 10% 43% 45%
18 SHOMAN Jenna - - 1% 9% 41% 50%
19 CHEN Xinyan - 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
20 BALAKUMARAN Maya - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
21 KRASTEV Minna - - 4% 20% 44% 32%
22 ANTHONY Alexia B. 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
23 LIAO Siwen - 4% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2%
24 SOURIMTO Valeria - 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3%
25 NATHANSON Sammy E. - 1% 5% 18% 35% 31% 10%
26 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. - 1% 7% 26% 40% 22% 4%
27 HASSANEIN Toqa - - - 4% 22% 50% 24%
28 OWENS Celine A. - 5% 26% 46% 21% 3%
29 LU Amy 2% 17% 37% 32% 10% 1%
30 LI Amanda C. - - 5% 27% 49% 19%
31 VADASZ Ibla P. - - 3% 17% 37% 33% 10%
32 CHANG Emily - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
33 KRYLOVA Valery - 2% 25% 43% 25% 5%
34 FAY Zoe A. - 4% 16% 33% 32% 13% 2%
35 DUCKETT Madison - 1% 6% 20% 36% 29% 9%
36 XIKES Katherine E. - 4% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
37 CRUZ Sonia 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
38 ALCEBAR Kayla - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
38 IQBAL Sulphia 1% 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1%
40 WANG Jianning 3% 24% 46% 23% 4% -
41 SINHA Anika - 1% 13% 38% 37% 11%
42 LU Elaine - 2% 15% 38% 35% 9% 1%
43 XU Emily T. - 4% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1%
44 LEE Sophia - 2% 14% 36% 34% 13% 2%
45 WEI Vivian W. 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% 1%
46 GIRARDI Aemilia - 3% 17% 37% 31% 10% 1%
47 YU Melinda - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
48 HE Lizbeth - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
49 RIZKALA Joanna - - 5% 24% 44% 27%
50 NG Sarah W. 9% 34% 38% 17% 3% -
51 GRAFF Sophie - - 3% 18% 38% 32% 9%
52 DEPEW Charlotte R. - 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
53 HESSLER Hope L. 1% 7% 31% 40% 18% 3% -
54 YUAN Greta - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
55 CHEN Xiaohan 2% 13% 28% 31% 19% 6% 1%
56 SIMONIAN Olivia A. 1% 8% 32% 38% 17% 3% -
57 PATNAIK Nastassia 1% 19% 40% 29% 9% 1% -
58 YI Felicia 24% 43% 26% 6% 1% - -
59 CHEN Ashley 2% 27% 41% 23% 6% 1% -
60 MADA Skye 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
61 JAVERI Amaya 4% 33% 39% 19% 4% - -
62 LIGH Karis 17% 40% 31% 10% 2% - -
63 REN Xinling 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
64 DANK Dina 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
65 LI Angela 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
66 ZHIZHIN Jeanette 17% 51% 26% 5% - - -
67 HAQ Nylah 18% 45% 29% 7% 1% - -
68 OGANEZOVA Valerie 1% 16% 42% 30% 9% 1% -
69 DAVIS Jordan 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
70 OBRADOVIC Ana 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
71 SHIH Christina 1% 12% 34% 36% 14% 1% -
72 COHEN Charlotte 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
73 KOTSEN Ava L. 51% 40% 9% 1% - -
74 NAYAK Anika 41% 42% 15% 2% - -
75 XU JENNY 45% 48% 7% - - -
76 ILYIN Polina 41% 43% 14% 2% - - -
77 HE Xi 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
78 BHOGAL Sukhleen 10% 49% 33% 8% 1% - -
79 LEUNG Ashlyn K. 9% 33% 37% 17% 4% - -
79 HORMEL Molly 66% 30% 4% - - - -
81 SULLIVAN Caroline 19% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
82 JENKINS Scotland 10% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
83 YAN Ava 16% 48% 30% 6% - -
84 MESSICK Maya 12% 36% 36% 13% 2% - -
85 CHARLES Caitlin 42% 51% 7% - - -
86 ZENG Megan 84% 15% 1% - - - -
86 FEO ZAKHAROVA Isabella 70% 26% 4% - - - -
88 WAIBEL Sophie 54% 38% 8% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.