Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WOODS Jack H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | CRALEY Thomas M. | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 5 | LIU Eric P. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 6 | DESANDO Michael R. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | LOCKWOOD Owen | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | HERGERT Benito | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 9 | WEINKOPF William O. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 10 | CARMAN Ian K. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 11 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 12 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | LIN Richard W. | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | LIAO Alex J. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | LI Yulei | V D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | VANNI Filippo A. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | V D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 21 | SIEGEL Elliot | V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | SANTULLI Tristan | D D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 23 | SOLIMAN Paul S. | V V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | DENYSE Jameson | D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | D D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | ONIK Elijah T. | D D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 27 | NAGER Noah | V V D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 28 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | D D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | HO Ryan J. | D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 30 | KWON Ethan | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | DU Samuel R. | D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | ZHAO Jesse | V D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 34 | SWADDIPONG Diego P. | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 35 | BAE Kevin | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 36 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | CAI Oliver K. | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 38 | BELLUOMO David C. | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 39 | BRODERICK Padraig | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | BOOTSMA Shawn-Ryan V. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.