Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Aaron Y. | D D V D V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 2 | JEON Alexander E. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | WILKENS Zach Q. | D D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 3 | SHARMA Sanil | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | FARQUHARSON Cole | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 6 | NG Alexander M. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | WEI Zikun | V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.5 | 4 | -1.5 |
| 8 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | LI Henry | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | RANGEL Arturo | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | WANG Nathan | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 12 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | LIN Ryan | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | WONG Daniel | V V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 15 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 16 | WELLS Tommy R. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | WALSH Kevin | V V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | MOSES Alexander | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 19 | LIANG Aaron | V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | THOMPSON Chester | V D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 23 | SINGHA Orion | D V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 24 | SHUR Yakov C. | D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | ZHOU Alec Q. | V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 26 | SMITH Zane A. | D V V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 27 | JIN daniel | V D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V D D D V V | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 30 | ZHU Max | D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | USHER Alexander | D D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 32 | FEES HOLDEN | V D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 33 | LEON Sebastian | D D V V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 34 | PARK Elliot | V V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 35 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 36 | MOHEBI Saam | V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 37 | WESTON Tom | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | HARRIS Roark S. | D V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 38 | MUIR Douglas K. | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 40 | KIM Sterling S. | V D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 41 | FOREMAN Alexander E. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 42 | AU Marcus J. | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 43 | CHON Joshua | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 44 | ESTRADA Luke | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 45 | YOUNG Jr Colby | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | WONG Nathan | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 47 | MILEY Nick N. | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | BAKER William | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 49 | MCGINLEY Walker | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 50 | TAMHANKAR Neil | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 51 | BISEN Aryaman | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 52 | PIROTTO Nicholas | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.