The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div I Women's Saber

Monday, July 1, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 BABY Sada M. V V V V V D V V V V V V 5.5 5 -0.5
2 JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. D V V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth V V V V V D V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
3 GOUHIN Chloe D V V V D V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
5 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
5 CHAN Casey V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
7 ANGLADE Alexis C. V V V D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
8 KIM Zoe V D D V V V V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
9 DI PERNA Chiara I. V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
10 MERZA Celina V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
11 MICHEL Violet N. V V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
11 WOZNIAK Kelli D V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
13 THEODORE Maria A. V V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
14 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. D V V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
15 IZENSON Lark (Keli) (Lark) D D V V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
16 LIANG Megan D D V V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
17 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
19 WHANG Rebecca V V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
20 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
21 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
22 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V V D V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
23 HARRILL Gillian N. V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
24 DUNGEY Amelia S. D V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
25 HE Charlotte V V V V D V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
26 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
27 CHIN Erika J. V D V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
28 HOFFMAN Ilsa L. D V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
29 POSSICK Lola P. D V V V V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
30 AVAKIAN Mikaela D V V V D D V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
31 HARRISON Imogen N. D D D V V D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
32 LACSON Sarah D V V D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
33 JENKINS Ryan J. V V V D V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
34 BURKE Nora S. V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
35 LINDER Kara E. V V V V V D D 5.0 5 -
36 LU Vivian Y. D V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
37 BERMAN Stella V V V V V D D 2.5 5 +2.5
38 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V D V D 3.0 5 +2.0
39 KONG Vera V V V V D D 3.2 4 +0.8
40 MILLER Sky V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
41 HIRSCH Sydney R. V V D V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
42 SULLIVAN Caroline E. V V V D D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
43 LEE Alexandra B. V D V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
44 BECCHINA Bridget F. V D V D V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
45 CHEN Erin Y. V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
46 TONG Kunling D V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
47 LI Anna M. V V D D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
48 SHEA Erin V V D V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
49 YUN Joy V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
50 OISHI Megumi V D D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
51 MOYA Keona L. V D D V D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
52 ROH Rachel E. D D V V V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
53 GREENBAUM Atara R. D D D V V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
54 KOZAK Sonja A. D V V D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
55 BUCHMANN Vivien V V D D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
56 ZEGERS Anneke E. D D D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
57 DOHERTY Maverick L. V D V V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
58 TIMOFEYEV Daniella D V D V V D V D 5.1 3 -2.1
59 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V V D D D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
60 WITEK Sophie B. V D D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
61 CHING Sapphira S. D V D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
62 HUNTER Nina B. V D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
63 LIU Rachel D D V D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
64 KATZ Anat V D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
65 TZOU Alexandra V V D D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
66 BEALE Zoe M. V V D V V D D 1.8 4 +2.2
67 WEINBERG Alexandra L. V V D V V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
68 PALMER Kristen E. D V V D V D 3.0 3 -
69 KOVACS Sophia D D V V V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
70 HOOGENDOORN Levi V V V D D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
71 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V D V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
72 HANADARI-LEVY Amit D D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
73 PINCUS Lucy Y. V D D V V D D 1.2 3 +1.8
74 LAMBERT Jasmine M. V D D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
75 SHEALY Maggie D D V V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
76 KIM Catherine D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
77 GREENBAUM Ella K. V D V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
78 LIN Audrey J. V D D D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
79 ZHUANG Sophia D D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
80 WANG Caroline Y. D V D D V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
80 WU Erica L. V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
82 CHANG Josephine S. D D V V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
83 CASHMAN Natalie D V D D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
84 YUN Maya D V D V D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
85 TURNER Zoe Y. D D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
85 TIMOFEYEV Nicole V D V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
87 MARSEE Samantha V D D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
88 DRAGON Rainer D V D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
89 SONG Jenny D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
90 WU Zoe V D D D D 0.3 1 +0.7
91 CHEN Erica D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
92 YONG Annika A. D V D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
93 VAN ATTA Grace Y. D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
94 SHVARTSMAN Rochelle D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
95 ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
96 SATHYANATH Kailing D D V D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
97 CHEEMA Sophia D D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
98 HILADO Sarah D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
99 FAHRI Monir J. D D D D D V 3.1 1 -2.1
99 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. D D D D D V 3.0 1 -2.0
101 REDDY Shreya D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
102 SHIN Andrea Y. D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 PARKER Abigale B. D D D D D V 2.9 1 -1.9
103 OXENSTIERNA Carolina D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
105 FLOREZ Melissa D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
105 KOO Samantha D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
107 MILLER Tiffany D. V D D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
108 YANG Kaitlyn H. V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
109 HOOGENDOORN Sterre D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
110 GHOSH Priyanka D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
110 YURT Leyla D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
112 DELSOIN Chelsea C. D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
113 WEBER Juliana I. D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
114 IYER Mohini R. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
115 MACE Eliza M. D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
116 CARNEY Gabriella D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.