Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 2 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 3 | BERRIO Carter E. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | MORRILL William | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 5 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 6 | JEFFRY Nicholas B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 7 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 9 | LUO George F. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 10 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 11 | HJERPE Wade H. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% |
| 12 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 13 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
| 15 | HOLZ William A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | MEHTA Krish | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | KIM Alexander M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
| 17 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 17 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 20 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 21 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
| 22 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 23 | LEE Christopher M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 24 | FENG Leo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 25 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 26 | WOODWARD Connor | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 27 | LEE Justin | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 28 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 29 | PANDEY Neil | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | GAO Albert | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 14% |
| 31 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 32 | DENG Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 33 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 34 | BAE Jason I. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 35 | YUN Jake | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 35 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 37 | LEE Aydan J. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 38 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
| 41 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% |
| 42 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 42 | XU Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 44 | ETIN Ari | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | HONG Steven | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 46 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 47 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | CANNON Logan T. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 51 | TASIKAS Stylianos | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 52 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 53 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 54 | WANG Nicolas | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | CHAN Aidan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | DALAL Rohan | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
| 57 | TURCK Caspar J. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 58 | ZENG Noah | 3% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 60 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 61 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 62 | THORNHILL Kwasi | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 63 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 3% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | HAN Edward | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | STURN Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 66 | HU Christopher | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 67 | LIN Daniel | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 68 | LEE Aidan S. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 69 | KLEIMAN Jakob | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 70 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 71 | MALONE Gregory D. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 72 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 73 | PENG Bryan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 74 | BERA Enzo | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 75 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 76 | CLARK Gabriel | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 77 | CHICA - HERRERA Brian | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 78 | ZHANG William | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 79 | MACHADO Brody A. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 80 | CHEEMA Hyder | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 80 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 82 | OH Triton | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 83 | CHOI Silas | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 84 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 85 | ZHANG Derek | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 86 | LEUNG cameron | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 87 | JEFFRY Christian B. | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 88 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 89 | LO Konnor | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 89 | VOSS Jeffer | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 92 | LIU Christopher X. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 93 | MAHAPATRA SAMARTH | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 94 | WEBER Mattias A. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | TAO Jeffrey | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 96 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 97 | CRAIG Samuel | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 98 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
| 99 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 100 | SKIMEL Michael | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | YU Thomas | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 102 | SAVOY Luca | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 103 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 104 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | DUCKETT Myles | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 106 | SHTEIN Yan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 107 | WANG Robert | - | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 108 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 109 | SMINK Oliver | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 110 | LEE Derek J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 111 | HUANG Connor | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 112 | HIREMATH Kushal | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 113 | CHENG Cody | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 114 | TRAN Tripp L. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 115 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 116 | NIETO Titus P. | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 118 | SU Landon | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 119 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 120 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 121 | HUNG Samuel | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 122 | CHEN Lohen | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 123 | WU Richard | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 124 | BONETTI Brayden | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 124 | DOWNEY Baran | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 126 | RASMUSSEN Oliver | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 127 | GUO Ethan | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 128 | KILGALLEN William | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 129 | BROU Inkosi | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 130 | CHEN Jia Tao | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 130 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 132 | PILAT Matthew J. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 133 | SIMMONS John M. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 134 | GAO Andrew | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 135 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 136 | WASSERMAN Aiden | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 137 | LIN Philip T. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 138 | ARROYO Santiago | 3% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 139 | LEWALLEN Reece | 5% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 140 | KOCHENSPARGER III Robert L. | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 141 | MORALES Jonathan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 141 | OSENAR Sam | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 143 | LEMPERT Adam | 10% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 144 | FELDMAN Drew | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 146 | AKS Ari | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 147 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 148 | LAU Justin Y. | 8% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 149 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 150 | GAUVEY Kieran | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 151 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 152 | MAY Griffin M. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 153 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 154 | PERRON Robert | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 155 | BULLARD Nicholas Y. | 10% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 156 | KERCHER Alexander | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 157 | PI Alexander | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 158 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 159 | ZHOU James Y. | 5% | 29% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 160 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 161 | QI Eric K. | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 161 | KIM Maxwell J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 163 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 164 | KAUFMAN Wyatt J. | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 166 | LINDSEY Aiden | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 167 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 167 | HUANG Alex F. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 169 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 170 | SUGIURA Samuel | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 171 | NORBORG Domingo | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 171 | PENG Victor | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 173 | GAINES Isaac M. | 2% | 32% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 174 | GERSTMANN Max T. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 174 | JOO Jeein | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 176 | GUREVICH Savely | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 177 | FIRSTMAN William B. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 177 | ANDRES Michael | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 179 | BRADFORD Tucker | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 181 | KIM Benjamin | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 181 | KALPATHY Rohit | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 183 | CHOW William T. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 184 | TANNER Jackson M. | 17% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 185 | YAN William | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 186 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 186 | MCGUIRE Christian | < 1% | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 188 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 188 | HENDERSON Jack | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 188 | CHENG Hong | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 191 | PREUD'HOMME Guillaume | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 191 | PARADIS Emmit | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 191 | LIN Hadrian | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 194 | CHANG Yuyang | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 195 | SUSTAR Mir | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 196 | LAGASSE Jack T. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.