San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEVY Jacob M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 2 | SHIH Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SOHN Christopher | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | KIM Isaiah G. | V D V D D D | V V V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 5 | LI Raphael C. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 6 | SHERMAN Marco J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | CHUNG Jinwoo | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | V V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 11 | LOMBARDI Leo | D V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 12 | LAO Scott E. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | MAO Connor | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | SPEVAK Alexander | V V D D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 15 | ZHENG Alan H. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 16 | HODESS Ethan | D V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 17 | CARTER Lucas M. | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 18 | OH Samuel H. | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | CHOI Ethan L. | V D V V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 20 | KUMBLA Samarth | D D V V D V | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 21 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | V D D D V V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 22 | KO Tyler B. | V V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | OTAKE Jared K. | D V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 24 | AVRON Case B. | V V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 25 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | V D D D V V | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 26 | LAI Christopher W. | D D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | LUNA Emilio | V D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | D D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | D D V V D D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 30 | HUANG Bernard | D D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | ZHANG Luke T. | D D D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 32 | VILLASENOR Aidan | D D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 33 | SELIVANOV Adam | D V D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 34 | SOMERS Sean | V D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | HSIUNG Richie | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 36 | SOOD Kishan S. | D D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 37 | HALL Harper | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 38 | PATINO Yahir | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 39 | MU Jeffrey | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 40 | SWEENEY Quinn | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 42 | COTHRAN Jack | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.