Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% |
| 2 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 3 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 3 | LONG Cindy | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 5 | LEE Olive | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 7 | DAVIS Sophie R. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | GIFFORD Emily R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 10 | WALLACE Katherine C. | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 11 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 12 | LEE Michelle | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 13 | BARR Abigail D. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 14 | ALLEN Susan B. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 15 | WEISS Olivia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 16 | GILLIS Alexandra G. | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 18 | CAO Catherine H. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 11% | |
| 19 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 20 | BOTNER Olivia | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 21 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | LEE kyungmin | - | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
| 23 | PALANSKI Cate | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | BROWN Amanda | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 25 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 26 | GILBRETH Meghan G. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 44% | 7% |
| 27 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | ZHANG Nicole | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ENDERLE Alexis N. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | CHANG Amanda Yen-Shih (Amanda) | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | CLAUSEN Amalie (Amy) | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
| 35 | YOUNG Ashley | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 37 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | YAO Jillian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 45% | 14% |
| 39 | SAGE Kayla G. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 40 | BARRETT Margaret E. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 41 | MOHEBI Sue | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | RICHARDS Caitlin A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 43 | COMES Rita | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 44 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
| 45 | KERAMANE Halah Z. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 46 | HAN Jaewon(Leah) | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 47 | PROVANCE Allison N. | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 31% | 6% | |
| 48 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 49 | CHUSID Alexandra | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 50 | RADICH Lori G. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LEWIS Sophia | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | FREY Alison | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | GIFFORD Sally | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | HOFMAN Haejung | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 7% | 39% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | HUZEL Lisa | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 57 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 58 | ZHANG Rachel Q. | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | LI Tiffany | 23% | 47% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | PETITE Jenny | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 62 | WHEELER Michele L. | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | RIOS Donna B. | 34% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | ZEHE Michele A. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 66 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 67 | COOPER Tina M. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 68 | JANDURA Janet | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | ROWLAND May | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | ONO Melisa | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | BONDAR Nika | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 74 | RUBIN Kathryn (Kay) M. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.