Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | KOBAL Maximilian | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | JITTAN daniel | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 5 | CHENG Nathan | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 6 | SICHITIU Alexander | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 7 | GATZA Logan | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 8 | SAGE Michael J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 9 | SYLVESTER William Z. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | LOVE Aaron | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | WONG Garrick G. | V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | ROUNTREE Rob | D V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 13 | CUI Anthony | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | BEALE Asa G. | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | TIYA BIAYA K. | D D V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 16 | HEARN Christen J. | V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 17 | BERNABE Rafael | D V V V V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 18 | ROSS III Paul D. | V V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | LONG Connor M. | V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 20 | JACK James | V V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 21 | YU Jonathan J. | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 22 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | V V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | WANG Duke R. | D V D V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 24 | BROWN Alexander R. | D V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | LEE Jacob | D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | AMMON Blue | V D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 27 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D V D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 28 | JONES Nate | D V D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | TUGGY Sam | D D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | KIM Justin | D D D D V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | O'CONNOR Kristian | V D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 31 | KIM Chaemin | D D D D V D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 33 | KNIZHNIK David | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | COLLUM Thomas | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | CHOY Spencer Andrew | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | BUCHENHORST Anton | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 37 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 38 | MADDOX Kamden | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 39 | SIGEL Noah | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | YUAN Austin | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.