The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

December NAC

Senior Men's Épée

Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 1:30 PM

Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 OUIMET Francois V V V V D V V V V V V V 3.9 5 +1.1
2 WANG Bowen D V V D V V V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
3 FEINBERG Gabriel M. D V V D V V V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
3 BEAULIEU Loic D D V V V V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
5 FREDERIKSEN Elijah L. V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
6 SANTOS Cameron A. V V D V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
7 NORTH Gary S. D V D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
8 MANDOKI Sandor I. V V D V D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
9 STONE Brian M. V V V V V V V V 3.3 6 +2.7
9 WEISSMAN Kai E. V V V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
11 BOYCE Samuel H. V V V V V V V V D 3.2 6 +2.8
12 MILLER Finn S. V V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
13 HAN Matthew V D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
14 LUNDBORG Jr. Tad C. V V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
15 GORDON Reis J. V D V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
16 MAISEL Simon F. D V V V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
17 MANCINI Christopher M. V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
18 MAZUR Mykhaylo Y. V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
19 WEISS Miles J. V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
20 YI Kyle V V V V V V D 2.2 5 +2.8
21 SJOSTEDT Jacob H. V V V V V V V D 3.0 6 +3.0
22 LICHTEN Keith H. V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
23 DAVIES Morgan D V V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
24 GRUPP Tristan E. V V V V D D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
25 KIM Ethan J. D V D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
26 DINKINS Ramadan V D D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
27 KANG Michael H. V V V D V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
28 LEIGH David A. V D D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
29 BEDOR William J. V D D V V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
30 TIRRELL Justin J. D D V D V V V D 2.0 2 -
31 STADNIKOV Tom V D D V D D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
32 KOZLOWSKI Matthew K. D V D D V D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
33 BASOK Daniel V V V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
34 MALIASSOV Nikita S. V V V D V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
35 LI Jesse V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 MARTIN Liam N. V V V V V D D 3.6 5 +1.4
37 KIM Derek D. D V V V V D 1.6 4 +2.4
38 WOLF Myles J. V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
39 KAMBESELES Peter G. D V V V V D D 4.4 4 -0.4
40 TABLEMAN Doug S. D V V V V D D 4.3 4 -0.3
41 ROGAK Benjamin A. D V V D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
42 KLASSEN Andrew P. V D V D V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
43 IYOKI Kent V D D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
44 CHIEN Brandon D D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
45 PLUMER Jack E. V D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
46 FULLER George K. V D D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
47 ZAFFT Maximo S. D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
48 BAILEY Nathan W. D V V D V V D 3.0 3 -
49 BLYTH Jourdain L. D V V V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
50 SHIREY Daniel L. V D V V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
51 MCKINLEY Liam K. D D V V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
52 SEABURY Maxwell G. V D D D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
53 MUNLIN Donovan V D D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
54 SHORT Salim (Sal) A. D V D V V D 1.0 2 +1.0
55 ARMSTRONG James G. V V D D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
56 RA Jr. Daniel M. V D V V D D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
57 EDWARDS Ethan S. V D D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
58 LAURON Sean M. V V D D V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
59 HAREL Jason D V V V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
60 BAKER Kevin G. D D V V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
61 COHEN Jared E. V V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
62 VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik V D D D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
63 MCCORMICK John B. V D D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
64 BURKE Matthew C. V D D D V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
65 KAMBESELES Jack M. V V V D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
66 AJNSZTAJN Alec J. D D V V V D D 3.7 3 -0.7
67 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. D V V V D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
68 RUSSANOV Boris J. D V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
69 MA Ark V V V D D D 4.4 3 -1.4
70 LENDER David V V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
71 LU Chung D V V D V D D 4.2 3 -1.2
72 WALTHER Bryan M. D V V D V D D 1.5 3 +1.5
73 STEELE DeMario A. D V D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
74 MOGILEVICH Michael D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
75 HIRSCHMAN Burton E. V D V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
76 VARNEY John R. V D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
77 LEE Timothy S. V D D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
78 CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) V D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
79 BOYLAN Jack (I Spy) V V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
80 MCDERMOTT Brian V D D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 CRASWELL Andrew J. D V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
82 COULL Abraham (Abe) D V V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
83 SPIER Julian H. D D V D D V D 4.4 2 -2.4
84 KIM Ethan S. D D V V D D D 4.0 2 -2.0
85 ATANAS Matthew M. V D D D D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
86 ASHER Andrew D. V D D D V D D 0.7 2 +1.3
87 GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) D D V D D 0.6 1 +0.4
88 STOTT Donovan R. D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
89 SAYLOR Harrison G. D D V D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
90 SMITH Justin C. D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
91 COTTER Alexander J. D D D D V D 3.0 1 -2.0
92 BETHEL Dylan A. D D V D D 2.9 1 -1.9
93 KLINE R. Jay D D D D V 1.7 1 -0.7
94 TOPAZ Nicholas D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
95 SMITH Calvin R. V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
96 CLINGSHOFF Christopher D V D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
97 OH Kevin Y. D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
97 AL-TAYEB Ahmed M. V D D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
99 DRAKE Owen G. D D D D D V 1.4 1 -0.4
100 HU Andre B. D D D D V D 0.3 1 +0.7
101 DAZEY Jason T. D V D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
102 ALI Adam D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
102 MARCHANT Albert J. D D D D D V 1.6 1 -0.6
104 ECKEL Anson J. D D D D D V 2.5 1 -1.5
105 ROBITZSKI Daniel A. D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
106 KRIEGISCH Jacob A. D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
107 VERNACHIO Anthony D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
108 RITCHIE Patrick Q. D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
109 CHAUDHRY Rafay D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
110 BAKER Julian L. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
111 FLINT James E. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.