Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | LEE Jacob J | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | PO Oliver | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 5 | LIN James G. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | XIANG Derrick | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | ZHOU Leon | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | MARX Jackson L. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 10 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | LIU Derek | V V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 12 | LEWIS Akhil | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | WANG Mason | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | XU Andy P. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 16 | CULHANE Dechen | D D V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 17 | ARICO Trey | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | SIMON Luke | V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 19 | KOVACS Wyatt | V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 20 | WONG Jackson | D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 21 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 22 | LIU Ryan | V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | SVERDLOV Seth | D V V D V | V | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | GAO Payton | V D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 25 | WILL Wrightington | D V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 26 | LI Aaron | D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 27 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | WANG Julang | D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | MALHAM Andrew | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | JIE WanYue | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | UNGERER Roger M. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | D D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | AKYAMAC Bora | V V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 34 | WANG Auther | V D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 35 | YE Gavin | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 36 | LIM Kevin | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 37 | ZHANG Aaron | D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 38 | ARCE Andrew W. | D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 39 | TANG Terry | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 40 | HIGGASON Hugh | V V D D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 41 | LIEW Jeremy K. | D D V D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 42 | WONG Jacob W. | D D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | WEI Qian | D D V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 44 | LEE Eugene | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 45 | LIM Charlie | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 46 | SHIM Peter S. | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 47 | CHA James | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | LI Allen | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 49 | XIA Eric | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 50 | KIAYIAS Aris | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 50 | WANG jason | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 52 | CROWE Adam D. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 52 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 54 | HUANG James | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 54 | ZHANG Lucas | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 56 | BROOKS Matthew | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.