San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
2 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
3 | SOHN Kevin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
3 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
5 | LIMB Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
6 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
7 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
8 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
9 | LIU David J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
10 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
11 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | ||
12 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
13 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
14 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
15 | GAO Albert | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
16 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | ||
17 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
18 | LEE Conner M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
19 | LUO George F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
20 | TANN Justin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | ||
21 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
22 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
23 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
24 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
25 | CHEN Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
26 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | JEFFRY Nicholas B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
28 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
29 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
30 | HJERPE Wade H. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
33 | LE Hayden | 100% | 99% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
34 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
35 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
36 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
37 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
38 | ALKIN Isaac | 100% | 95% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | |
39 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | ||
40 | XU Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
41 | SHERES Asher | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
42 | LO Konnor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
43 | VAUGHN Dylan A. | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
45 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
46 | HODGES Calvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
47 | JEFFRY Christian B. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
49 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 9% | |
50 | HAQ Omar M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
51 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
52 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
53 | ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
54 | RODRÍGUEZ Jose | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
55 | LEE Sean | 100% | 90% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
56 | BURNS Caleb | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
57 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
58 | SHI Kyle | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
59 | ROBLEDO Everett M. | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
60 | LEWALLEN Reece | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
61 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 95% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | |
62 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | ||
63 | XU William | 100% | 99% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | WANG YiLe(Justin) | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
65 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
66 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.