National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 2 | WEI JoyAnn | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 3 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 3 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 17% |
| 5 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 6 | WU Yuwei | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 8 | MATIER Alice | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | BERMAN greta | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 10 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 11 | HUANG Doris | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 12 | CHAN Jolene | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 13 | DANTULURI Shalini | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 14 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 15 | LIU Yifei | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | BERNARD Kathryn | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 18 | MCAFEE Jada | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 19 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 42% | 19% |
| 20 | CHEN Elaine | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 21 | WANG Callie | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 22 | MYAT Chloe | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 23 | DAMBAL Sasha | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 24 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | BUSH Bethany | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 26 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | MIKULSKI Maggie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 28 | HENDERSON Sunhi | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 29 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | VASQUEZ Pia | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | LIU Hannah | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | BORGUETA Madison | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | SHEBL Nadia | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 34 | HOWARD Veronica | 16% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | BUSH Divina | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | HSU leah | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 37 | GONG Joy | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | CHANG Norah | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | XIONG Alina | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 41 | ATHANSON Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 42 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FATTEH-PATIL Sophia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | LI Tiffany | 2% | 27% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WENG Amber | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LEMAITRE Nina | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | FLEEGER Sophia | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LEE Tammy | 54% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | HO Sophia | 39% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | ZHU Lillian | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | FAN Alexandria | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | GUZZO Rossella | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.