The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Capitol Clash SYC, RCC, Veteran ROC & Y8

Cadet Women's Saber

Monday, January 20, 2020 at 1:00 PM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
2 BLUM Leah I. - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
3 SATHYANATH Kailing - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
3 LU Elaine - 4% 23% 46% 24% 3%
5 ANDRES Katherine A. - - - 3% 17% 44% 35%
6 CANNON Sophia E. - 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 9%
7 HILD Nisha - 2% 17% 42% 32% 6%
8 DELSOIN Chelsea C. - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 20%
9 OLSEN Natalie J. - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
10 SHOMAN Jenna - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
11 CHEN Xiaohan - - 2% 15% 37% 35% 9%
12 CARVALHO Isabela A. - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
13 TANG Annie L. - - - 4% 19% 42% 34%
14 NEWELL Alexia C. - 1% 11% 32% 39% 17%
15 CHANG Emily - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 5%
16 JOHNSON Lauren - - 5% 29% 50% 17%
17 VADASZ Ibla P. - 3% 19% 37% 31% 9%
18 GORMAN Victoria M. - - 4% 19% 43% 34%
19 SOURIMTO Valeria - 1% 9% 32% 42% 17%
20 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
21 HASSANEIN Toqa - 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3%
22 NYSTROM Sofia C. - 6% 25% 41% 24% 3%
23 TAO Hannah J. - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
24 SHI Cathleen 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
25 WIGGERS Susan Q. - - - 3% 18% 42% 37%
26 KOO Samantha - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 10%
27 KER Grace - - 6% 23% 38% 27% 7%
28 MIKA Veronica - - 3% 20% 45% 32%
29 DUCKETT Madison - 1% 13% 39% 38% 9%
30 PRIEUR Lauren - - 1% 11% 36% 41% 11%
31 LIAO Siwen 2% 12% 32% 33% 17% 4% -
32 ANTHONY Alexia B. 1% 7% 27% 38% 22% 5%
33 NG Sarah W. 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2% -
34 ROMAGNOLI Isabella - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 7%
35 YANG Ashley M. - - 1% 6% 26% 46% 22%
36 LUKASHENKO Angelina - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
37 DHAR Aamina 1% 8% 34% 39% 16% 2%
38 BENTOLILA Thalia - 8% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
39 WEI Vivian W. - 1% 10% 33% 39% 16% 2%
40 BEVACQUA Aria F. - 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1%
41 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) - 3% 15% 36% 36% 11%
42 IQBAL Sulphia 6% 28% 40% 21% 4% -
43 SHOMAN Miriam - 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
44 HOVERMAN Hannah A. - 1% 12% 36% 37% 13% 1%
45 YUAN Greta 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
46 CHEN Ashley - 6% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
47 OBRADOVIC Ana 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
48 ILYIN Anna 3% 21% 45% 25% 5% - -
49 TODD Phoebe - 3% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
50 CHIANG Emily - 4% 25% 43% 24% 4%
51 JAVERI Amaya 15% 41% 34% 10% 1% -
52 GRINBERG Aliya 2% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
53 LARIMER Katherine E. - 3% 18% 40% 32% 6%
54 CHEN Xinyan - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 2%
55 NAYAK Indra 2% 13% 32% 34% 15% 3% -
56 DILLE Carolina G. 11% 41% 34% 12% 2% - -
57 LIGH Erenei J. - 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
58 CRUZ Sonia 28% 47% 20% 4% - - -
59 MU Vicki Y. 2% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
60 OGANEZOVA Valerie 5% 29% 40% 21% 5% -
61 MA Grace C. 9% 34% 38% 16% 3% -
62 ZHAO Emily W. 14% 44% 31% 9% 1% -
63 RODRIGUEZ Colette O. 15% 49% 29% 7% 1% - -
64 NAYAK Mira 18% 41% 31% 9% 1% - -
65 WANG Jianning 2% 17% 44% 30% 7% -
66 JENKINS Scotland 16% 41% 31% 10% 2% - -
67 PENG Florella 1% 9% 31% 37% 18% 4% -
68 GREENHALGH Abigail 58% 35% 7% 1% - -
69 D'ORAZIO Sofia V. 19% 46% 29% 5% - -
70 BHOGAL Sukhleen 61% 33% 6% - - -
71 SAHNI Sophia 47% 40% 12% 1% - -
72 ZENG Megan 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
73 MESSICK Maya 18% 49% 28% 5% - - -
74 MENDOZA Mariah 1% 7% 27% 41% 22% 2% -
75 HSU Mia Y. 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
76 CHARLES Caitlin 49% 40% 10% 1% - - -
77 COHEN Charlotte 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
78 HE Xi 38% 43% 16% 3% - -
79 ELDER Rhiannon C. 63% 33% 4% - - - -
80 KERBEL Natalie 13% 54% 28% 5% - -
81 CHO Madeleine K. 14% 62% 22% 3% - -
81 CALISTRI Ava 15% 39% 33% 11% 1% -
83 BOWDEN Ms Hope A. 59% 33% 7% 1% - - -
84 MEYTIN Sophia E. 15% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
85 ILYIN Polina 53% 37% 9% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.