The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

SYC - Portland Super Youth Circuit

Y-12 Men's Foil

Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 1:00 PM

Beaverton, OR - Beaverton, OR, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GOOR Julian - - - 3% 16% 43% 38%
2 LO Conrad - - - - 2% 24% 74%
3 WYMAN Julian 1% 7% 23% 35% 27% 8%
3 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - - 3% 17% 42% 37%
5 KRYLTSOV Michael - - 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
6 KIM Andrew J. - - 4% 21% 39% 28% 7%
7 LEE Christopher T. - - 1% 7% 31% 51% 10%
8 RUBIN Max 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% < 1%
9 LLIDO Soren - 1% 8% 29% 41% 20%
10 KANG Anthony Jaegu - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
10 SIU Aiden - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 3%
12 WOO Christian - 1% 5% 20% 36% 30% 8%
13 MIN Eric - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
14 WU Lucas - 1% 11% 32% 40% 16%
15 RANJITH Yash M. - 10% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
16 MA Andrew - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
17 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 32%
18 CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) - 1% 6% 24% 40% 24% 5%
19 CHEN Justin K. 8% 28% 35% 22% 6% 1%
20 ZHANG Jiening G. - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 6%
21 KIM Ryan Y. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
22 PO Oliver - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
23 FUKUDA Diego - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
24 DINSAY Kristjan - 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1%
25 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
26 OH Jaden - 5% 22% 39% 28% 6% -
27 GUERRA Gabriel H. - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
28 RASMUSSEN Sage 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
29 LIN Michael - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5%
30 RAJ Jay 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
31 ZENG Chuyi 7% 35% 39% 17% 3% - -
32 SHAGIDANYAN German 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 2% -
33 CHOI Ethan - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 21%
34 TONKOVICH Ryan 1% 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
35 SHEN Oliver - 3% 19% 38% 31% 8%
36 YU Jason - - 2% 13% 35% 38% 12%
37 KIM Harrison 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
38 LEVY Jacob - 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
39 FANG Jaden 3% 19% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
40 LING Eddie 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
41 LIU William 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
42 ZHONG Alan D. 5% 23% 35% 26% 9% 2% -
43 HUBATKA Jarry Q. - 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
44 NG Micah 1% 10% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
45 BARTELS Marc 3% 29% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
46 ZHU Raymond 3% 23% 41% 26% 7% 1%
47 MAKO Keegan 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
48 LO Preston 7% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
49 MA Bryant 4% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
50 AGRAWAL Niki 4% 29% 41% 21% 5% -
51 DERRICK Blake 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
52 WU Alber Y. 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
53 SAH Steven 10% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
54 LYNCH Owen C. - < 1% 5% 21% 37% 29% 7%
55 LI Samuel 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
56 KIM Aiden 1% 9% 29% 38% 19% 4% -
56 DONG Quintin - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
58 ZHANG Graham 23% 50% 23% 4% - - -
59 WU Alistair 50% 38% 11% 1% - - -
60 ZHANG Luke 80% 19% 2% - - - -
61 SONG Jeremy 13% 33% 34% 17% 4% -
62 KIM Teo 60% 33% 6% - - - -
62 NGUYEN martin 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
64 LOFTUS Luca 2% 15% 36% 34% 13% 1% -
65 YUE Jackson 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
66 KALAMAS Nikolas 50% 42% 8% 1% - - -
67 FLENNIKEN Liam 64% 31% 5% - - -
68 ANDREWS William 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.