The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, February 28, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - 1% 11% 37% 50%
2 BAS Liam - 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 6%
3 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 31%
3 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. - 3% 16% 34% 34% 12%
5 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - 1% 6% 20% 35% 30% 10%
6 LAURICELLA Douglas - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 10%
7 WU Nicholas - 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9%
8 KWON Ethan 1% 6% 20% 33% 27% 11% 2%
9 FUKUDA Alessio R. - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
10 HONDA Kazu Z. - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
11 CHEN Allen - - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
12 KASI Sanjay - - 3% 14% 31% 35% 15%
13 STANLEY Mason B. - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
14 MITCHELL Philip D. - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
14 LI Jiaan - - 4% 16% 34% 33% 12%
16 SINGH Dayaal - 4% 29% 46% 21%
17 ZHANG Henry C. - - 1% 11% 31% 39% 17%
18 ZHANG Andy W. - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
19 LEE Aidan 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1%
20 JEON Caleb A. - 4% 17% 35% 33% 12%
21 PELOSKY Zack B. - 4% 30% 45% 20%
22 YEROKHIN Michael N. - 3% 16% 33% 33% 14% 2%
23 KOBAL Maximilian 1% 8% 27% 35% 22% 6% 1%
24 KIM Brandon J. - 1% 10% 26% 34% 23% 6%
25 WEN George C. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 2%
26 DU Samuel R. - 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2%
27 SONG Dylan S. 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
28 AHN Jun 1% 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
29 KAO Castor T. - 4% 27% 46% 22%
30 FUKUDA Renzo K. 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
31 BUERGIN Aidan 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
32 WU Alexander 5% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1%
33 HUTH Mitchell - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
34 BREIER Matthew F. 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2%
35 HOOSHI Jayden C. - 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
36 BAE Kevin - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
37 SHA Yi Peng 1% 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
38 YANG Luao - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
39 WU Jerry 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
40 BELLUOMO David C. 3% 24% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
41 LE Vyn A. 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% -
42 ZHAO Jason L. - 4% 16% 35% 33% 12%
43 HOOSHI Dylan M. - 4% 16% 34% 34% 13%
44 WU Alexander 1% 5% 19% 34% 31% 11%
45 SCHENCK Koen M. 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
46 FU Samuel Y. 2% 13% 32% 34% 17% 3%
48 FOGELSON Frederick J. - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 4%
49 TIAN Aaron C. 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
50 KEE Andrew L. 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
51 SONG Aiden S. - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
52 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 10% 30% 34% 19% 5% 1%
53 GATZA Logan 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% -
53 GRAHAM Roy J. 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6%
55 LI Richard 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 4%
56 CHEN Andrew - - 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
57 DAI Jonathan T. - 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
57 SICHITIU Alexander 1% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
59 KULKARNI Ansh A. 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
60 CHUNG Noah J. 15% 38% 32% 13% 3% - -
61 PAE Jonathan L. 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1%
62 LI Matthew 19% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -
63 YU Jonathan J. 34% 51% 14% 1% -
64 LIU Eric Y. 8% 28% 35% 21% 7% 1% -
65 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 10% 1%
66 WECHSLER Jacob 11% 40% 34% 13% 2% - -
67 GAO William 43% 47% 9% 1% -
68 BRUK Peter J. 1% 5% 19% 32% 29% 12% 2%
69 BING Charles - 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
70 NAGER Noah - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
71 OH SEAN - 4% 20% 37% 28% 9% 1%
72 TAN Christien 25% 44% 25% 6% 1% - -
73 RUSADZE Nickolas - 2% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
74 LOVE Aaron 40% 41% 16% 3% - -
75 TSAI Max W. 4% 29% 41% 21% 5% - -
76 TORRES Treston 13% 41% 33% 11% 2% - -
77 MARX Oscar L. - 3% 13% 30% 33% 17% 3%
77 KNIZHNIK David 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
79 DRESSEL Jet 48% 40% 11% 1% - - -
80 CHIN Julian S. 2% 15% 32% 33% 15% 3%
81 MENG Zhaoyi 21% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
82 PAE Brian L. 11% 31% 33% 18% 5% 1% -
83 LIN Michael 24% 44% 25% 6% 1% - -
84 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 24% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
85 TSIMMERMAN Michael 76% 22% 2% - - - -
85 ADAMS Cyrus 65% 30% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.