The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Women's Épée

Friday, February 28, 2020 at 12:30 PM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HUSISIAN Hadley N. V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 KHAMIS Yasmine A. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 PYO Yunice D V V V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
3 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. D V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
5 NI Emma V V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
6 PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. V V V V D V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
7 GU Sarah V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
8 KIM Diane E. V V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
9 NING Emma V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
10 FENG Kelly L. V V V V V D V D 3.5 5 +1.5
11 LUO Ashley V V V V V D V D 3.7 5 +1.3
12 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. V V D V D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
13 MAO Amy D V V D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
14 GAJJALA Sharika R. D V V V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
15 MING Cynthia D V V D D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
16 GUMAGAY Erika L. V D D V V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
17 LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
18 REID Sobia V D V V V D D 3.6 4 +0.4
19 LU Samantha R. V V V D D V D 1.9 4 +2.1
20 LONG Cindy V V D D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
21 DESAI Meera P. V D V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
22 SLACKMAN Valerie D V D V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
23 KIM Erika S. D D D D V V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
24 OGAWA Kaylin D D V V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
25 PAPADAKIS Lily D V D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
26 CHAN Elizabeth V D D V D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
27 HENRY Asha S. D D D D V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
28 SINGH Aayushi V D V D D D V D 0.7 2 +1.3
29 KIM Elizabeth Y. D D V D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
30 REITINGER Emilie B. D D D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
31 BELSLEY Devon K. D D D V D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
32 COBERT Helen G. D D D V D D V D 3.7 1 -2.7
33 LIVERANT Jordan S. D V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
33 EBRAHIM Ameera H. V D D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
35 PAN Michelle D D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
36 TONG Sarah Shen V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
37 TOMASELLO Olivia E. D V V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
38 FLO Sena D V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
39 BECCHINA Olivia V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
40 CORDERO Allison D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
41 SZEWC Alexandra D V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
42 YU Bailey D D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
43 LEE Olive V D D V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
44 ZHENG Linden V D D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
45 HU Chelsea V D D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
46 LEE Yedda D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
47 NICOU Nicole D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
48 GUZZI Jordan D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.