The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Saber

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FRISHMAN Ethan J. V V V V V D V V V V V V 4.9 5 +0.1
2 WOOD Elden S. V V V D D V V V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
3 BENAVRAM Lev C. V D V V D V V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
3 ZU Kevin V V V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
5 NADILE Henry V. V V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
6 BARNETT Adam V D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
7 MIKA Casper V V V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
8 BASALYGA Jeffrey V V V D V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
9 SINGER Carson V V D V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
10 MORREALE John V V D V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
11 QUAN Nicholas V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
12 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. V V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
13 HAMMER Peter A. V V D D V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
14 KIM Avery J. D D V V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
15 SHI Andrew D V V V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
16 LINSKY Matthew D D D V D D V V V D 3.8 1 -2.8
17 ZHOU Matthew R. V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 LAI Adam J. V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
19 CHAMBERS Amir E. V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
20 KIM Minwook D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
21 ZHOU Kevin V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 LO Joshua H. V V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
23 LEE Kyle V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
24 YAO Jonathan V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
25 GANTA Vijay V V D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
26 CHAN Matthew D V V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
27 CHO Brandon V V V D V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
28 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V V D V D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
29 LIU kelly V D V V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
30 BARTOLO Domenic V. D D V V D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
31 DODRILL Grant D D V D V V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
32 STEINMETZ John V D D D V D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
33 JEAN Noe T. V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
34 LAHOTSKA Yahor V V V V V D D 3.9 5 +1.1
35 LIN William D V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
36 MORRILL Justin V V D V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
37 CHEN Oscar D V V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
37 QIU Le V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
39 ERACHSHAW Taras P. V D V V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
40 HAMMERSTROM Jared D V V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 RAI Avin D V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
42 DENNER Maximilian P. D D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
43 HUDDY Brandon J. D V V D V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
44 ZHOU Justin D V D V V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
45 MORRILL William V V D D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
46 CHANG Eliot A. V D V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
47 HOUTZ Jackson V D V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
48 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. V D D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
49 WOODWARD Dylan P. V D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
50 YANG Richard D D V D V V D 2.0 2 -
51 YEN Preston D D D V V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
52 COLE Alexander V D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
53 GINIS Nathan D D V D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
53 ALTIRS Alexander D D D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
55 QIN Alexander D D V V D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
56 JARAMILLO Tobias L. D V D D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
57 CHIN Matthew W. D D D D V V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
58 HUANG Tyler T. D D V V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
59 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. V D D V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
60 NOBLE Colin V D D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
61 LEE Jude H. D D D D V V D 1.3 1 -0.3
62 BERMAN Luca D D D D D V V D 2.3 1 -1.3
63 GREENBAUM Ian L. D D V D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
64 KOGAN Benjamin D V D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
65 CHEONG Heonjae V D V V V D D 2.4 4 +1.6
66 WIND Nicky E. V D V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
67 HUSSAIN Faaris V V V D V D D 3.9 4 +0.1
68 TONG Qilin V V D D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
69 WILSON Jude D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
70 KENNEDY Liam A. V V D V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
71 LEONARD Cole D V V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
72 NG Jonathan H. V V D V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
73 REN Richard D V D D V V D 0.9 3 +2.1
74 FLORES Peter D. D V V V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
75 BUKOWSKI Bronson V D D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
76 RABINKOV Anthony V V V D D D D 3.3 3 -0.3
77 WOODWARD Connor D V V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
78 PAN Andrew W. D D V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
79 GHENEA George Philipe V V D V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
80 GILES Jeremy M. D V V D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
81 PANDEY Neil D V D V V D D 1.1 3 +1.9
82 LU Timothy D D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
83 GILMORE Thomas W. V D V D V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
84 SIMAK Joseph P. V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
85 WUN William V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
86 JIANG Kevin V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 EPSTEIN Henry N. D V D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
88 DIACOS Jordan V D D D V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
89 ZHOU Miles V V D D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
90 HARGENRADER Kailen A. D V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
91 NIL Michael Y. D V D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
92 HONG Steven D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
93 GRASS James D. D D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
94 NEVILLE James D D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
95 LEDERER Justin W. D D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
96 CHAVES Matthew J. D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
96 KEEFE Duncan D D V D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
98 LEE Justin V D D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
99 COSGROVE Connor R. D D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
100 CHENG Kyle D D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
101 LO Alexander D D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
102 MAKLIN Edward P. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
102 TEVEBAUGH Andrew D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
104 GEORGE Daniel D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
105 LEE Aydan J. D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
106 COX Luis E. D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
107 MOLINARO Lawrence D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
108 WALKER Robert Connor D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.