Southwest Recreation Center - Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GATZA Logan | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 2 | JORGENSEN Alexander | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 3 | DERBAUM Ryan | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 3 | TOMINO Rafael | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 5 | DERBAUM Brandon | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 53% | 32% |
| 7 | DONDERIS A.J. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 8 | FELIX Ian | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 9 | YOON Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 10 | BOUIE Jacob | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 11 | CHAPARRO Alejandra | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 12 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 45% |
| 13 | SEEMAN Jonathan | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 14 | JITTAN Daniel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 15 | LEWIS Jared | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
| 15 | VIVEROS Evan | 1% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | - | |
| 17 | ALLEN Braeden | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | BRACELIS Josias | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% | |
| 19 | YIM Alex | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 52% | 20% |
| 20 | GARCES Alan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | FREESE Christine | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 21 | KIM Chaemin | 2% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | RIVERA Ivan | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 25 | RUDOLPH Max | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 42% | |
| 26 | CEDERQUIST Zachary | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 27 | VIVEROS Oscar | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 28 | CURTIS William | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
| 29 | COLEMAN Mark | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | VIVEROS Antonio | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | O'CONNOR Kristian | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | DEAN Briana | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | ROMERO Sophia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | BATRA Dev | 20% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | KNOEPFFLER Andrea | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CASPER Emily | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | HANSEN Shane | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | GARCIA Jorge | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | EDWARDS Darby | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BATRA Savita | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | BECK Kelsey | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | ANDERSON Tyler | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 43 | SPEARS Scott | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 44 | WATKINS Christopher | - | 8% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 45 | BROSCHE Rohan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 46 | OROZCO Diego | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 47 | RIVERA Amanda | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | HARTMANS Jae | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | BASALONE Daniele | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | RIVERA Frederick | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 50 | GRACIA Alexander | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | MEJIA-RUIZ Isabella | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | HOGG J.C. | 27% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | JOHNSON Nicholas | 4% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | FOOTE Regan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 56 | YIM Rachael | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | WOOD Tate | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | LIOTTA Madison | 4% | 27% | 49% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | GEIGER Emma | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | CINTRON Erika | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | CUNANAN Enzo | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | WU Velyn | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | HANAWALT Reagan | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | CUNANAN Ethan | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.