The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

January NAC

Junior Women's Saber

Saturday, January 4, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Charlotte, NC - Charlotte, NC, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ANGLADE Alexis C. V V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.2 6 +0.8
2 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth V D V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
3 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
3 JENKINS Ryan J. V D V V V D V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
5 HOFFMAN Ilsa L. V V V D V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
6 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
7 KONG Vera D V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
8 DI PERNA Chiara I. V V D V V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
9 KIM Zoe V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
10 GOUHIN Chloe V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
11 HARRISON Imogen N. V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
12 PAK Kaitlyn V V V V D V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
13 LINDER Kara E. D D V V V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
14 GREENBAUM Atara R. D D V V D V V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
15 PARKER Abigale B. D V V D D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
16 THEODORE Maria A. D D D V V D V V V D 4.9 2 -2.9
17 MOYA Keona L. V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
18 JOHNSON Honor B. D V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
19 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. V V V V D V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
20 LIANG Megan D V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
21 SHEALY Maggie V V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
22 TANG Annie L. V V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
23 HARRILL Gillian N. V V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
24 SWALLOW Abigail R. D V V V V V V D 1.4 4 +2.6
25 CHIN Erika J. V V D V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
26 MARSEE Samantha D V D V V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
27 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V V D V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
28 SHEA Erin V V V D V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
29 CHAN Casey V D V D D V V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
29 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria D D V V V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
31 LEE Alexandra B. D V V D V D V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
32 HANADARI-LEVY Amit D D D V V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
33 KOVACS Sophia V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
34 JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
35 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
36 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
37 YUN Joy V D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
38 MILLER Sky V V V D V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
39 WEBER Juliana I. V V V V D V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
40 TZOU Alexandra V V V D V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
41 KOO Samantha D V V V V V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
42 LU Vivian Y. V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
43 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. D D V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
44 FLOREZ Melissa V V V D V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
45 SATHYANATH Kailing V V V D V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
46 TIMOFEYEV Daniella D V D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
47 WEINBERG Alexandra L. V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
48 POSSICK Lola P. V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
49 ANDRES Katherine A. V V D D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
50 TONG Kunling D V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
51 VAN ATTA Grace Y. V V D V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
52 GORMAN Alexandra C. V D V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
53 OISHI Megumi D V V V D D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
54 CHANG Josephine S. V D V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
55 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. V D D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
56 KUZNETSOVA Nastassja D V D V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 HE Charlotte D V V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
58 WHANG Rebecca D V V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
59 ROH Rachel E. V D V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
60 LACSON Sarah V V V D D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
61 ATLURI Sara V. V D D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
62 SHOMAN Jenna D D V D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
63 HIRSCH Sydney R. D D V D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
64 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) V D D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
65 BOIS Adele V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
66 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. D V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
67 HOOGENDOORN Sterre V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
68 TIMOFEYEV Nicole D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
69 WIGGERS Susan Q. V V V V D V D 3.0 5 +2.0
70 GREENBAUM Ella K. V V V V D D D 3.5 4 +0.5
71 TUCKER Iman R. V D V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
72 CHING Sapphira S. V V D D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
73 CHANG Emily D V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
74 KALRA Himani V. V D D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
75 CAO Stephanie X. D V V V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
76 GORMAN Victoria M. V D V V V D D 2.0 4 +2.0
77 LIN Audrey J. V D V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
78 JULIEN Michelle V V V V D D D 2.5 4 +1.5
79 GORMLEY Arwen E. V V V D V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
80 MIKA Veronica V V V D V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
81 CHAN Audrey V V V V D D D 2.7 4 +1.3
82 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea D V V D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
83 BERMAN Stella V V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
84 BLUM Leah I. V V D D V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
85 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V D D D V D 4.3 3 -1.3
86 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. D V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
87 PINCUS Lucy Y. V V V D D D D 2.4 3 +0.6
87 DOHERTY Maverick L. V D D V V D D 4.3 3 -1.3
89 YUN Maya D V D V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
90 KATZ Anat D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
91 NEIBART Fiona V D V D D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
92 LI Victoria J. D D V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
93 TURNER Zoe Y. D D D V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
94 TAO Hannah J. V D D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
95 STONE Hava S. V D D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
96 DODRILL Brooke D V V D V D D 1.2 3 +1.8
97 VALADEZ Emily T. V D V V D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
98 HAN Jeanette X. D D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
99 WALTER Zsofia R. D V V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
99 HOOGENDOORN Levi V V D D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
101 LU Amy D V D V V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
102 CHEN Xinyan V D V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
103 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. D V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
104 SCHMITT Alana P. D V V D V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
105 HONE Katarina G. V D D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
106 SHAY-TANNAS Zoe D V V V D D D 2.0 3 +1.0
107 KIM Catherine V D D V D D D 3.4 2 -1.4
108 PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. D V D V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
109 ZEGERS Anneke E. D V D V D D D 4.5 2 -2.5
110 MORALES Jessica Y. V D V D D D D 4.4 2 -2.4
111 TANG Catherine H. D V V D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
111 LIAO Siwen D V D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
113 LU Yi Lin D V D D V D D 2.0 2 -
114 WITEK Sophie B. D D V V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
115 CARVALHO Isabela A. D V D D V D D 3.7 2 -1.7
116 RHIE Lena D V D D V D D 1.2 2 +0.8
117 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. D D V V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
118 OLSEN Natalie J. V D D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
119 BROWN Emma D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
120 BUCHMANN Vivien D V D D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
121 BAE EMMELINE D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
122 HILADO Sarah D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
123 ANDRES Charmaine G. D D D V V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
124 EDGINGTON Grace V D D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
125 REDDY Shreya D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
126 PINCUS Emma Y. D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
127 WU Erica L. V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
128 DHAR Aamina V D D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
129 MENKE Kavya I. D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
130 BENOIT Adelaide L. V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
130 HOVERMAN Hannah A. V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
132 FREEDMAN Janna N. D D D D V D 3.8 1 -2.8
133 YURT Leyla D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
133 BOURGEOIS audreane D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
135 DANAHY Ellen D. D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
136 MANUBAG Amanda R. D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
137 MATAIEV Natalie S. D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
138 CHIANG Emily D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
139 TURNOF Kayla M. V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
140 ROBINSON Stella V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
141 DARINGA Arianna D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
142 SHIN Andrea Y. D D D D D V 2.3 1 -1.3
143 NYSTROM Sofia C. D D D D D V 1.4 1 -0.4
144 YANG Kaitlyn H. D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
145 DELSOIN Chelsea C. D D D D D D 2.7 0 -2.7
145 NG Sarah W. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
145 SHOMAN Miriam D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
148 SCHIKORE Anna M. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
149 CANSECO Laura K. D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
150 CHEN Chloe Y. D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
151 ABOUDAHER Janna A. D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
152 LIU Rachel D D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
152 BILILIES Sophia D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
154 RODGERS Sally E. D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
155 HAYES Grace Y. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
156 SHI Cathleen D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
157 BOLTON Eleksi M. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
157 MERCHANT MeiLiu D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
159 SOUANE Oumy D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.