The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Boston Fencing Club ROC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, February 2, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ANDREEV Arthur - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
2 FEINBERG Gabriel M. - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
3 INSLER Gabriel C. - 2% 11% 29% 34% 20% 4%
3 WHELAN Thomas (Tony) - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 23%
5 JONES Simon A. - - - 2% 13% 39% 46%
6 MUNLIN Donovan - - 3% 16% 35% 35% 11%
7 DOLMETSCH Max 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
8 MARKHAM Jimmy - 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
9 GIBSON Nowell L. - - 1% 10% 29% 40% 19%
10 JONES Tristan Kai - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
11 MAISEL Simon F. - - 4% 21% 41% 29% 4%
12 YU Colin - - 1% 5% 20% 40% 34%
13 LEIGH David A. - - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
14 MCDERMOTT Brian - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
15 INSLER Ethan C. - 1% 7% 23% 38% 26% 5%
16 GOHEL Dayus T. - 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2%
17 YOSHIDA Stephen R. - 4% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
18 YUROVCHAK Andrew T. - - 2% 9% 28% 39% 22%
19 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. - 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
20 MEHALL Michael - 1% 6% 24% 41% 25% 4%
21 DECKER Tristan H. - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
22 NIXON Christian A. 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
23 MACKIN Samuel - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
24 MORSE Tyler 2% 12% 28% 32% 20% 6% 1%
25 COLLYMORE Spencer T. - 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 9%
26 KRONROD Tal - 3% 16% 39% 31% 9% 1%
27 GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
28 THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. 2% 22% 38% 27% 9% 2% -
29 GARCIA-ROGERS Kyle J. - 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
30 SIDDIQUI Humza K. 4% 20% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
31 WU Joseph 2% 13% 29% 32% 19% 5% 1%
32 PRIHODKO Max 18% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
33 JIN Alexander 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
34 LANGTON Sawyer - 4% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
35 SUMLER Jeffery - 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
36 ZAFFT Maximo S. - 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8%
37 ALFAIATE Lucas - 5% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
38 CARVALHO Daniel S. 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% -
39 SCOTT George R. 1% 6% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
40 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
40 MCDERMOTT James E. 10% 33% 36% 17% 4% - -
40 FOLEY Kevin - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
43 HU Jansen T. 19% 42% 29% 9% 1% - -
44 BELLIVEAU Raven C. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
45 LAI Coby 9% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
46 SCHACK Samuel D. 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
46 HANRATTY Liam 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
48 SHAH Maximilian A. - 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
49 BURKE Cyril 2% 24% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
50 SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. - 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3%
51 KAIN Brad 76% 22% 2% - - - -
52 KOLKER Gregory A. 1% 15% 35% 33% 14% 3% -
53 ADAMIAN David 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
53 PAHLAVI Kamran 14% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
55 BURNHAM Charlie E. 1% 6% 25% 37% 24% 6% 1%
56 SKIFFINGTON Sam 20% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
57 MATEI Daniel 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
58 GERSEN Jacob 20% 44% 29% 7% 1% - -
59 PAPAVASSILIOU Christos 87% 13% 1% - - - -
59 HERBERT Harrison 81% 18% 1% - - - -
61 HA Daniel 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
62 PAGE Duncan 31% 44% 20% 4% - - -
63 CONNELLY Asa D. 19% 43% 30% 7% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.