The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

The Fencing Center SYC

Y-12 Men's Foil

Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 8:00 AM

The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - - - 2% 24% 75%
2 FUKUDA Diego - - - 2% 12% 41% 46%
3 LO Preston - - 1% 4% 19% 41% 35%
3 NGUYEN martin - 2% 16% 42% 33% 7%
5 MORROW Brenden - - - 3% 17% 45% 36%
6 ZHANG Aaron - - 1% 6% 24% 44% 25%
7 NICOLETTI Luca - - 1% 7% 29% 53% 11%
8 TSAY Jordan R. 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
9 MAO Lucas - - 1% 5% 24% 43% 27%
10 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
11 RASMUSSEN Sage - - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
12 KIAYIAS Aris - 1% 6% 20% 34% 30% 10%
13 LING Eddie - - - 5% 34% 60%
14 KIM Daniel Y. - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 11%
15 WONG Jacob W. - 1% 9% 27% 39% 21% 3%
16 DERRICK Blake - 1% 12% 39% 38% 9%
17 SENIC Lucas - - - - 3% 24% 73%
18 CORTRIGHT Skipper - - 1% 7% 25% 43% 24%
19 RAUTUREAU Hugo - - 1% 7% 27% 45% 21%
20 WU Alber Y. - - 4% 18% 42% 37%
21 BORG Matthew 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
22 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas - 2% 12% 34% 37% 14% 2%
23 UHLIG Cole 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
24 HIRAMOTO Satoshi - 3% 13% 29% 34% 18% 3%
25 YI William - - 6% 30% 50% 14%
26 LEE Christopher T. - - 1% 11% 40% 49%
27 NGAI Julian - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
28 DANIEL Nikith 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
29 SHEN Oliver - - 5% 20% 39% 30% 7%
30 PARK Rion 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
31 LU Kevin - - 2% 13% 36% 38% 11%
32 YANG Charles - - 3% 16% 38% 33% 9%
33 CHANG Jeremy - 5% 22% 39% 26% 7% 1%
34 BIELER Mason - 2% 11% 30% 36% 19% 2%
35 NISHIHIRA Tyler 1% 7% 24% 37% 24% 7% 1%
36 DULAI Angad - 2% 10% 26% 34% 22% 5%
37 LI Richard 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
38 HE Ian 11% 34% 36% 15% 3% - -
39 KAWADA Sebastien - 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 5%
40 MORROW Sean - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
41 RAUTUREAU Arthur - 6% 27% 45% 20% 2%
42 ZHANG Graham 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
43 CHUN Dashel 1% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5% -
44 PALMA Nathan Anthony - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 22%
45 WONG Evan 1% 5% 18% 31% 29% 14% 3%
46 PARK William 2% 16% 35% 33% 13% 1% -
47 FUKUDA Brando 1% 13% 38% 34% 12% 2% -
48 ZHOU Ryan 13% 38% 34% 13% 2% -
49 LEHTINEN Axel 3% 23% 46% 24% 3% -
50 GORDON William L. 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
51 CHOI Ethan - 2% 13% 32% 36% 14% 2%
52 CHEN Matthew 15% 35% 32% 15% 3% - -
53 YU ShiYu (Henry) 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
54 JEONG Taewoo 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
55 DULAI Agam 1% 11% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
56 CHEN David 63% 33% 4% - - -
57 MANIKTALA Suvir 1% 12% 44% 34% 9% 1%
58 HE Bourne 18% 56% 23% 3% - -
59 CHANG Eric Jonathan 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
60 LE Jacob 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% 1% -
61 FU Bryan 13% 44% 33% 10% 1% - -
62 TULYAG Azim 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% 1%
63 ZHANG Max 14% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
64 YUE Jackson 1% 9% 27% 38% 22% 4% -
65 UPENDER West 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
66 SISINNI Leonardo 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1% -
67 CHAN Joseph 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% - -
68 PARK Roy 25% 49% 23% 4% - -
69 WANG rainier 23% 40% 27% 9% 2% - -
70 YU ShiLin (Harry) 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% - -
71 CHANG Jonathan - 4% 22% 40% 26% 6% -
72 VAQUILAR Felix L. 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
73 ANDRADE Cedric 25% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
74 HOM Logan 5% 25% 40% 24% 6% 1% -
75 CHEN Andrew 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6% -
76 TOYOFUKU Ethan 18% 38% 31% 12% 2% -
77 SONG Matthew 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
78 WANDJI NANA Noah 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
79 WU Thomas 28% 43% 23% 6% 1% - -
80 BANUELOS Dario 26% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
81 LIM Zachary 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
82 ZHONG Maxwell 27% 44% 23% 5% - - -
83 DENG David 11% 33% 34% 17% 4% 1% -
84 KIM Andrew 36% 45% 16% 2% - -
85 LIANG Ethan 20% 43% 28% 7% 1% - -
85 ONG Nicholas 8% 26% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
87 YAN Rian 17% 40% 31% 11% 2% - -
87 FOY Grant 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.