The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

The Fencing Center SYC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 8:00 AM

The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SADOVSKY Leor B. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.1 6 +0.9
2 KRYLTSOV Michael V V D V V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
3 SHEN Owen V V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
3 SISINNI Riccardo V V V D V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
5 MARTIN IV Elmer D. V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
6 KANG Anthony V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
7 KIM Aiden V V V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
8 KIM Andrew J. D V V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
9 CO Dylan V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
10 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. V D V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
11 MA Andrew D V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
12 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) V V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
13 FUKUDA Diego V V V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
14 RASMUSSEN Sage D V V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
15 LEE Dylan V V D V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
16 SHAGIDANYAN German D D V V D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
17 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
18 ZHANG Jiening G. V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
19 LING Eddie V V V V V D V D 4.0 5 +1.0
20 COELHO Cristiano P. V V V V V D V D 5.5 5 -0.5
21 LIPPMAN Sam V V V V D V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
22 NGUYEN martin D V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
23 WU Alber Y. V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
24 LI Matthew V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
25 LLIDO Soren V V V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
26 HOSKERI Anik S. V D V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
27 KIM Ryan Y. V V D V V D V D 4.8 4 -0.8
28 LI Samuel D V V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
29 KIAYIAS Aris V V V D D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
30 LO Preston V D D V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
31 MAO Lucas V V V D D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
32 PARK Rion D D D D D D V V D 2.2 0 -2.2
33 PARK Sky V V D V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
34 CHOI Ethan D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
35 ZHANG Aaron V V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
36 WONG Evan V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
37 MA Bryant V D V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
38 RUBIN Max V D V V D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
39 LI Richard V V V V D D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
40 LYNCH Owen C. D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 AGRAWAL Niki D D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
42 WU Lucas D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
43 MORROW Brenden V V V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
44 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas D D V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
45 TSAY Jordan R. D D V D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
46 LEE Christopher T. D V D V V D V D 4.3 3 -1.3
47 DERRICK Blake D D V D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
48 FANG Jaden V V D V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
49 KIM Daniel Y. V D V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
50 WU Alistair V V D V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
51 TONKOVICH Ryan D V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
52 CHAN Connor D V V V D D V D 1.1 3 +1.9
53 YI William V V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
54 SENIC Lucas D D V V D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
55 RANJITH Yash M. D D V V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
56 CHUN Dashel V D D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
57 PALMA Nathan Anthony D D D V V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
58 UHLIG Cole D D V D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
59 YUE Jackson D D D V D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
60 CORTRIGHT Skipper D V D D D D V D 4.2 1 -3.2
61 LIU William D D D D V D V D 2.7 1 -1.7
62 NICOLETTI Luca D D D D D V D 3.0 0 -3.0
63 ZHOU Ryan D D D D D D V D 1.4 0 -1.4
64 WONG Jacob W. D D D D D D V D 1.7 0 -1.7
65 BORG Matthew D V V V V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
66 PONS Diego V D V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
67 HIRAMOTO Satoshi V D D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
68 PARK Ryan V D D D V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
69 LAM Nicolas D V V V D D D 2.7 3 +0.3
70 NGAI Julian D V V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
71 KAREHT Kai D V V D D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
72 SCHIENEMAN Valentine D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
73 CHOI Ethan V D D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
74 LUI Jake V V D D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
75 LU Kevin D D D D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
76 SONG Matthew D V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
77 LE Jacob D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
78 ONG William D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
79 MANIKTALA Suvir V D D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
80 GORDON William L. D D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
81 PERKINS Jaray D D D D V D D 2.9 1 -1.9
82 UPENDER West V D D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
83 SAH Steven D D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
84 JIANG Yehong D D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
85 ZHANG Graham D V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
86 BHOBE Arjun D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
87 DULAI Angad D V D D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
88 FLIGOR William D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
89 TULYAG Azim D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
89 CHAN Joseph D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
91 BANUELOS Dario D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
92 HOM Logan D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
93 LIANG Ethan D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
93 JEONG Taewoo D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
95 FOY Grant D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.