National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Y-12 Women's Épée

Friday, July 9, 2021 at 8:30 AM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 RAKHOVSKI Alexandra - - 2% 9% 27% 39% 22%
2 AZMEH nour - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
3 NGUYEN Ashley L. - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 10%
3 WITTER Catherine A. - - 3% 19% 43% 34%
5 LEE REGINA - - 3% 13% 30% 36% 17%
6 JAKEL Alysa C. - 5% 18% 34% 31% 12%
7 LEE Olivia - 2% 10% 25% 34% 23% 6%
8 WATTANAKIT Anda - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 29%
9 ZHU Serene M. - 1% 7% 24% 36% 26% 7%
10 BECKMAN Ana - 1% 5% 17% 33% 32% 12%
11 SMUK Alexandra S. 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
12 QIU Emily 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
13 NIX Reagan 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
14 DOUGLAS Marketa F. 10% 31% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
15 SONG Angela 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
16 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) - 2% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
17 BUSH emma - - 1% 7% 23% 41% 28%
18 SHARMA Sanvi - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
19 CHI Chelsea - - 3% 14% 31% 35% 15%
20 PATIL Amulya - - 3% 15% 35% 35% 11%
21 HAYNES Antonia - 5% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
22 SHIV Avni - - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
23 CHISHOLM Phoebe C. - 1% 5% 20% 38% 29% 7%
24 YILMAZ Pinar - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
25 YAO Melinda - - 2% 12% 31% 39% 16%
26 LEE Camilla - 2% 10% 25% 35% 23% 6%
27 CAFASSO Natalya - 2% 9% 24% 34% 24% 7%
28 FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana - 1% 5% 17% 33% 32% 12%
29 WANG Ziqi - 5% 23% 40% 26% 5%
30 KOVALCHUK Erika S. - 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8%
31 ZHAO Ivy 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2%
32 SHEN Yongen 2% 11% 29% 34% 20% 4%
33 NEMETH Katherine - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
34 CARRIER Meredith - 2% 12% 28% 34% 20% 4%
35 SPRINGER Sierra - 2% 9% 24% 35% 24% 6%
36 LEE Claire 2% 11% 27% 33% 20% 6% 1%
37 PROFIS Liora - 4% 17% 31% 30% 14% 3%
38 MISHIMA Audrey 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 5% 1%
39 MCKENNA Analise 8% 27% 34% 22% 7% 1% -
40 KINDEL Amara 4% 24% 41% 25% 6% -
41 LIN Ariel 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
42 GUO Luxi 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
43 LUO Amy 1% 9% 26% 34% 23% 7% 1%
44 ZHAO Angela 20% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
45 YOUNG VIVIAN 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% -
46 NOVOJILOV Anastasia 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
47 KWON Genevie 5% 22% 34% 26% 11% 2% -
48 JUN Bomie 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
49 NGUYEN Jolie T. - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
50 MEYER Rachel 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% 1% -
51 PRESMAN Aerin 12% 32% 34% 18% 5% -
52 STERR Isabella M. - 2% 11% 34% 39% 13%
52 PULLEN Ayah 1% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
54 CHATIKHINE Anastasia 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
55 SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna 15% 40% 33% 11% 1% -
56 WANG Angelina 2% 18% 37% 31% 11% 1%
57 MIRZA Annoshae 1% 9% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1%
58 WANG Jessie 19% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
59 YERIAN Ayda - 3% 15% 30% 32% 16% 3%
60 HASIM Eurietta 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 2% -
61 QIAN Irene - 2% 10% 26% 34% 22% 5%
62 GUAN Isabella 2% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
63 NEELAM Navya 9% 39% 36% 14% 3% - -
64 AGAON Evelyn - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
65 FOUX Abigail 11% 31% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
66 KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita - 3% 14% 29% 32% 18% 4%
67 DAVIS Elisabeth 20% 39% 29% 11% 2% - -
68 MEYER Rebecca 42% 40% 15% 3% - - -
69 HSIU Elizabeth 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
70 LEE Gloria 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
71 SCHMITT Harper 1% 8% 24% 33% 24% 8% 1%
72 CHANG Abigail 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
73 MARTYNOVA Diana 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
74 SMOTRITSKY Liat 35% 44% 18% 3% - -
75 PHUKAN Indra 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
76 ANDERSON Melody 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
77 KUMAR Eva 1% 7% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1%
78 LIU Charlotte 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
79 MALLAVARPU saanvi 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 7% 1%
80 KUMAR Anusha 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
81 WANG Victoria 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
82 SNYDER Kathryn 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
83 PATELLI Anna Alice 7% 24% 34% 25% 9% 2% -
84 MONOVA Lilyana 3% 16% 31% 30% 16% 4% -
85 KROPP Anne 51% 37% 10% 1% - -
86 JONES Veronica C. 58% 35% 7% 1% - - -
87 HOY Emmarose 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
88 WRIGHT Madison 19% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.