Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HUTH Mitchell | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | D D V D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 5 | MOHAMED Amir | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 6 | LI Matthew | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | EMENHEISER Conrad | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 8 | KNIZHNIK David | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 9 | LIN Michael | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 10 | ROSE Ben | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | WECHSLER Jacob | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | LIU Eric Y. | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | JITTAN daniel | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | SICHITIU Alexander | V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CANO Marcos E. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 16 | WANG Winston | V V D V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | GAO William | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | WONG Garrick G. | V V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | HO Jia Le Sean | V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 20 | SAGE Michael P. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | MOHAMED Murad | V D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | DRESSEL Jet | D D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | GORBACHEV Alexander | D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 24 | LEE Aidan | V V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 25 | PAN Henry | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | TANG Owen S. | V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 27 | SONG Austin | V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 28 | OH SEAN | D D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 29 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 30 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | D V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 31 | KLYCZEK Andrew | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 32 | IVANENKO Alex | V D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 33 | DE COQUET Maximilian | V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 34 | YAO Bradley | D V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 35 | ORLOV Dmitriy | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | WANG Brayden | D V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | HUANG Eythan | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 38 | QIAN Jason H. | D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 38 | TIYA BIAYA K. | D D V V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 40 | QUINN Nathan | D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 41 | TANG Albert | D V D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 42 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | D D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 43 | BERNABE Rafael | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 44 | TANG August L. | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 45 | TIKHAEV Alexander | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | DUSZA Zachery | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 47 | ZOU Yuming | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 48 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | V D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 49 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 50 | GOKCE Ellis | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 51 | QUINTERO Julian | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 52 | BATRA Dev | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 53 | RILEY Colin T. | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 54 | DEMIR Omer | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 55 | DEGER Grant W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 56 | CAO Vincent | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.