Birmingham, AL - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% | |
| 2 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 31% | |
| 3 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | - | - | - | 6% | 45% | 48% | |
| 3 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
| 5 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% | |
| 6 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 53% | 35% | |
| 7 | GISLER Benjamin B. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | - |
| 8 | JITTAN daniel | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% | 2% | |
| 9 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | - |
| 10 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 1% | 17% | 45% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 10 | BERNABE Rafael | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | LEE Jacob | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | - | |
| 14 | LEE Lukas | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | KNIZHNIK David | 6% | 46% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | WANG Winston | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | WECHSLER Jacob | 1% | 12% | 39% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 18 | PAN Henry | 5% | 36% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | HEARN Christen J. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 20 | ROSS III Paul D. | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 10% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WANG Brayden | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | ZOU Yuming | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | KIM Chaevin | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.