Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Daniel D. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 42% | 51% |
| 2 | LI Brandon H. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 3 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | LI Owen | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 5 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
| 6 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 53% | 26% |
| 7 | YANG Adam | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 8 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 9 | LIU Patrick | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 10 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 11 | KWON Ethan | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 12 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | 9% | 37% | 44% | 10% | |
| 13 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 14 | KAO Castor T. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 15 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 18 | LIU Niles J. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% | |
| 19 | JIMENEZ Diran | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% | |
| 20 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 1% | 19% | 47% | 30% | 2% |
| 21 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 1% |
| 22 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
| 23 | NAGER Noah | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 30% | 2% |
| 24 | LI Eric | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 25 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 30% | 4% | |
| 25 | ACHILOV Sayid | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | XIAO Anthony | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | BING Charles | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 29 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 6% | 42% | 40% | 11% | - |
| 30 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | BROWN Alexander R. | 2% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | DING Jonathan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 33 | YANG Andy H. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 34 | LIGH Thomas | 2% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | LEE Chris | - | - | 1% | 17% | 46% | 34% | 3% |
| 37 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 9% | 41% | 44% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 39 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 1% | 14% | 48% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | ZHAO Jesse | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | LI Arvin | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 3% | 22% | 49% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | SANTULLI Tristan | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 44 | MILLER Aidan A. | 25% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 44 | WERWA Griffith | 34% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | GONG Benjamin | 8% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | JIN Dennis H. | 25% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | HOWARD Michael | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | KONG Luculentus X. | 14% | 48% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | LI Ayren | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GARDOS Noah | 41% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | BOUSSY Luciano | 28% | 50% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | QI Steve | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | WU Michael | 54% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | LIU Charles | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | REN Bingye | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.