Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | GRIFFIN John O. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | RITCHIE Luke W. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V V D D | V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 5 | OURSLER Jack | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 7 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 8 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 9 | LOCKWOOD Owen | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 9 | LIN Richard W. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | ONIK Elijah T. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | BUERGIN Aidan | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 15 | DIVENTI Paul W. | D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | PRASANNA Advaith | D D V D D V | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 17 | BELLUOMO David C. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 18 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | SHA Yi Peng | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 20 | WAN Jason | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 21 | WU Nicholas | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 22 | XIAO Anthony | V D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 23 | WU Alexander | V D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 24 | KWON Ethan | D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 25 | GU Jeffrey | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | OH SEAN | V D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | LUH Ethan K. | V D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | JEON Caleb A. | D D V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 29 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | UPTON Craig | V D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 32 | CAI Oliver K. | D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 33 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 34 | BAE Kevin | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 35 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 36 | DING Jonathan | D D V V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 37 | KEE Andrew L. | V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 38 | WALTER Evran M. | V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 39 | CHOI Samuel | D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 40 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 41 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | V D V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 42 | FU Samuel Y. | D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 43 | RINEHART Conner M. | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 44 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 45 | HSIUNG Richie | V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 46 | ROUNTREE Rob | D V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 47 | TIAN Aaron C. | D V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 48 | VIVEROS Evan | D V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 49 | ZHENG zhe | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 50 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 51 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | D D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 52 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | D V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 53 | EVANS Aidan | V D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 54 | ZHAO Dylan L. | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 54 | KOBAL Maximilian | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 56 | WECHSLER Jacob | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 57 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 58 | LEE Jacob | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 59 | BERNABE Rafael | D D D V D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 60 | GAUTAM Vishnu | D D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 61 | WERWA Griffith | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 62 | NEWELL Ian A. | D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 63 | LE Vyn A. | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 64 | YU Jonathan J. | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 65 | DE COQUET Maximilian | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 66 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 67 | LI Ryan Z. | D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 68 | PITERBARG Maxim | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 69 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 69 | VIVEROS Antonio | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.