The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

May NAC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WANG Eric Y. - - - 5% 21% 42% 32%
2 WILSON Jude - - - 2% 12% 38% 48%
3 SIMAK Joseph P. - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
3 ZHENG Edward L. - 1% 19% 39% 30% 10% 1%
5 SHIRPAL Oleksandr - - 1% 8% 29% 45% 16%
6 JIANG Anthony - - - 2% 16% 43% 38%
7 HUANG Ethan F. - 3% 13% 28% 32% 19% 4%
8 KIM Alexander M. - 1% 9% 30% 41% 19%
9 BERRIO Carter E. - - 3% 13% 33% 36% 15%
10 CHON Taylor A. - - 1% 7% 28% 45% 18%
11 ZHANG Derek 2% 12% 29% 33% 18% 4% -
12 SHOMAN Noah - 4% 20% 38% 30% 9%
13 JI Cody Walter - - - 2% 13% 42% 44%
14 DENG Andrew - 3% 16% 34% 32% 14% 2%
15 HOLZ William A. - 1% 22% 40% 27% 8% 1%
16 NG Jeremiah 1% 8% 26% 36% 24% 6%
17 BABAYEV Gabriel A. - 3% 11% 26% 33% 21% 6%
18 YUN Jake - 4% 17% 35% 33% 12%
19 NOURELDIN Gabriel 1% 9% 23% 32% 24% 9% 1%
20 QIU Nathan - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
20 MICLAUS Justin 4% 28% 39% 23% 6% 1%
22 EICHHORN Lukas H. - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
23 ROSBERG Dashiell W. 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 5%
24 ATANASSOV Vasil V. - 1% 9% 25% 36% 23% 4%
25 BLEYMAN David 2% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3% -
26 REN James 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
27 LEE Aydan J. - 2% 12% 28% 34% 20% 4%
28 CHOI Silas - 1% 5% 19% 34% 30% 11%
29 HOLZ Daniel - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
30 COOK Cole 4% 20% 36% 28% 11% 2% -
31 LEE Justin 1% 8% 22% 32% 25% 10% 2%
32 HOUTZ Mitchell B. 31% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
33 LIN Daniel - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
34 ERMAKOV Lev - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
35 HJERPE Wade H. - 2% 10% 27% 34% 21% 5%
36 WANG Robert - 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 6%
37 KOGAN Benjamin - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
38 SHOMAN Zachary - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
39 STURN Oliver 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
40 BAE Jason I. - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
41 WANG Nicolas - 2% 13% 33% 36% 14% 2%
42 DEPEW Spencer 4% 21% 37% 27% 9% 2% -
43 SAVOY Luca - 1% 8% 24% 37% 25% 6%
44 WOODWARD Connor - - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
45 MEHTA Krish 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4% -
46 KIM Shaun M. 1% 7% 25% 36% 25% 6%
47 FENG Leo - 2% 11% 31% 39% 18%
48 CHEONG Heonjun 1% 22% 41% 27% 8% 1%
49 DUDNICK Christian 20% 46% 27% 7% 1% - -
50 MCCARTHY Gabriel - 4% 19% 36% 30% 9% 1%
51 MAKLIN Edward P. - 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
52 ZENG Noah - 9% 31% 38% 19% 3%
53 SU Landon 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2%
54 PENG Bryan 1% 9% 30% 37% 20% 4%
55 BUCHMANN Finn D. - 7% 27% 38% 23% 5%
56 NAZLYMOV Andrei - - 6% 26% 39% 24% 5%
56 KUMAR Sachit 44% 40% 14% 2% - - -
58 VOSS Jeffer 48% 39% 11% 1% - -
59 KILGALLEN William 5% 20% 33% 27% 12% 3% -
60 POSY Daniel 6% 29% 39% 21% 5% - -
61 CHTERENTAL Alex 2% 15% 32% 32% 16% 3% -
62 DILLE Jackson K. 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
63 HOTHA Nikhil 44% 43% 12% 2% - - -
64 BUKOWSKI Broghan J. 46% 39% 13% 2% - -
65 CANNON Logan T. 2% 15% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
65 FLITSANOV Macabee 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
67 BROU Inkosi 2% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
68 GOLD Carter 14% 71% 15% 1% - - -
69 HU Christopher 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
70 LIU Mingyang Ryan 4% 19% 36% 30% 11% 1% -
71 CHEEMA Hyder 3% 14% 29% 30% 17% 5% 1%
71 TANG Charles 14% 37% 33% 13% 3% - -
73 PATIL Aaryan A. - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
74 HUANG Maxwell H. 2% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
75 MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu 14% 36% 33% 14% 2% - -
76 BERA Enzo - 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1%
77 WALKE Devin 3% 15% 30% 30% 17% 5% 1%
78 OH Triton 1% 10% 27% 34% 22% 6% -
79 CHAN Aidan 8% 29% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
79 YAN William 4% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
81 JORGESON Charlie 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
82 KANG evan < 1% 4% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
83 KROON Lucas 9% 36% 37% 15% 3% -
83 KIRCHMAIER Charlie 80% 19% 2% - - -
85 DECK Tyson 61% 32% 6% 1% - -
86 LIGH Checed 38% 41% 17% 4% - - -
86 RODGERS Jacob 81% 18% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.