The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

May NAC

Cadet Women's Épée

Friday, May 7, 2021 at 8:45 AM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 PATURU Meghana V V D V V V V V V V V V 4.9 5 +0.1
2 MACHULSKY Leehi D D V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
3 OXENREIDER Tierna A. V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
3 KHAMIS Yasmine A. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
5 KETKAR Ketki V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
6 WATRALL Christina V D V V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
7 CHIN Isabella V V V V D V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
8 WANG Elizabeth V V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
9 DOUGLAS Julia F. V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
10 TYLER Syd V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
11 SMITH Grace L. V V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
12 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. D D V V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
13 MCLANE Lauren V V D V V D V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
14 GU Sarah V D D V V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
15 FELAND Alexandra V D D V V D V V V D 3.0 3 -
16 ELSTON Sophia D V V D D V V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
17 JAKEL Sophia N. V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
18 MAO Amy V D V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
19 NGUYEN Tallulah V V V D V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
20 WANG Nora V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
21 PEELER Julia V D V V V V D 0.9 4 +3.1
22 KETKAR Mallika D V V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
23 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. V V D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
24 DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia V V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
25 GANDHI Sedna S. V D V V D V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
26 DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. V V D D V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
27 FALLON Kyle R. V V V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
28 CHOI Eunice V D V D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
29 WU Amelia V D V D V D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
30 TEMIRYAEV Anna M. D V V D D D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
31 LU Samantha R. V D V D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
32 KUZNETSOV Victoria V D D D D V V D 2.7 1 -1.7
33 LEANG Priscilla Y. V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
34 LIN Katie Y. V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
35 WANG Karen V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
36 LIU Christina A. V V V V D V D 3.7 5 +1.3
37 SMUK Daria A. V V V D V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
38 MING Cynthia D V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
39 ZAFFT Tatiana M. V V V V D V D 5.2 5 -0.2
40 PADHYE Tanishka V V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
41 LEUNG Natalie V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
42 ZIGALO Elizabeth D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
43 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
44 PAN Michelle V V D V V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
45 KORFONTA Jolie V V D D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
46 WITTE Vera D V V V D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
47 SMOTRITSKY Mia V V D V V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
48 MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. V D V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
49 CHAN Elizabeth V V D V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
50 JAMES Josephine V D D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
51 DESAI Meera P. D D V V V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
52 MEHROTRA Anya D D V D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
53 MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. D D V V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
54 O'DONNELL Amanda A. D V D V V D V D 5.0 3 -2.0
55 AHUJA Arianna D V V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
56 LUO Ashley V V D D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
57 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. D D V V D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
58 KIM Erika S. V D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
59 HESS Heidi J. D V D D D V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
60 MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) V D D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
61 FURMAN Maria D D D D V V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
62 GAO Judy D D D D V V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
63 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. D V D D D V D 3.3 1 -2.3
63 YAO KATHARINE D D D V D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
65 RUNIONS Emersyn V V V D V D D 3.6 4 +0.4
66 ZUHARS Renee A. D V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
67 MALDONADO Pilar I. V V D D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
68 WITTER Catherine A. V V V V D D D 1.5 4 +2.5
69 CALDERA Lexi I. D V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
70 PAPADAKIS Lily V D V V V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
71 REID Anousheh V V D V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
71 HAFEEZ Hania D V V V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
73 DARANOUVONG Logan V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
74 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. V V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
75 ZHANG Victoria R. D V V V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
76 KIM Zoe L. D V D V V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
77 WEBER Nora V D V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
78 CHAN Cheri K. D D V V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
79 LONADIER Keira V V D D V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
80 CAPELLUA Mariasole D V D V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
81 HAFEEZ Hiba D V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
82 ZHANG Tina Tianyi D V D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
83 AZMEH nour D V V D D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
84 YOON Katherine D D V V V D D 1.1 3 +1.9
85 ZENG Katrina V V D D D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
86 SHERTZ Kira E. D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 KIM Elizabeth Y. D D V V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
88 SWENSON Nikita G. D D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
89 GAJJALA Sharika R. D V V D D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
90 GABERKORN Nadia D V D D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
91 MUELLER Emma M. D D D V V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
92 GUMAGAY Erika L. V D D D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
93 WONG Alexandra R. D D V V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
94 PALANSKI Cate D D D V D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
95 SAAL Anna V D V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
96 NEELAM Neha V V D D D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
97 CHANG Ella D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
98 LEE Michelle J. D D D D V D 3.4 1 -2.4
99 LI Alisha D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
100 MOON Seojung D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
101 ALEXANDROV Katherine S. D D D D D V 3.4 1 -2.4
102 LIN Elaine D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
103 POPOVICI Alina B. D D V D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
104 BURCHETT Victoria V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
104 NGUYEN Audrey V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
106 MUN Brianna K. D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
107 GAURIAT Jade S. V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
108 RAINEY Zoe-Andrea D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
109 CHENG Ava D D D V D D 3.1 1 -2.1
110 GEVA Eliana D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
110 TYTELL Elizabeth D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
112 SPRINGER Sierra D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
113 LIU Nicole D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
114 LEE Yedda D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
115 DILLE Carolina G. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
116 KIM Jayna D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
117 MACEDON Gianna D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
118 NIKOLIC DE JACINTO Alix P. D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
118 NELSON Grace E. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
118 BYBEE Lucy J. D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
121 CHANG Ella D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.