The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

May NAC

Junior Men's Saber

Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HARLEY Colby A. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.4 6 +0.6
2 ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
3 MOON Sean H. V V D V V D V V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
3 WIND Nicky E. V V V D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
5 KUSHKOV Simon O. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
5 BOLTON Braydon A. V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
7 LIMB Matthew G. V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
8 ZHOU Matthew R. V D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
9 HARVEY Nicholas J. V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
10 CHOI HYUNSEOK V V V V V D V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
11 YEN Darren V D V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
12 WILLIAMS Nolan E. V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
13 JARAMILLO Tobias L. V V V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
14 CALLAHAN Jaden P. D V D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
15 LE Hayden V V D D V V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
16 BERMAN Luca D V D D D V V V V D 2.0 2 -
17 LORTKIPANIDZE Nickoloz V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
18 WOOD Elden S. V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
19 TRAVERS Samir T. V V V V D V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
20 SKINNER Graham B. D V V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
21 MORRILL William V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
22 TANN Justin D V V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
23 HONG Marshall Q. V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
24 BARNETT Adam D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
25 KOTOV Leonid V V V D V V D 1.1 4 +2.9
26 LINSKY Matthew V V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
27 LUKASHENKO Darii V V D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
28 SHI Andrew V D V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
29 D'ORAZIO Joseph V D D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
30 MIKA Casper D V D V V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
31 ATTIG Will T. V D V D D V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
32 RAJA Arnav D D V V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
33 TE VELDE Noah C. V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
34 SCHMITT Trenton R. V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
35 PRIEST Leighton K. V D V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
36 LEVIN Mark A. V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
37 PORTMANN Stein J. V V V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
38 BERGER Oliver V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
39 DODRILL Grant V D D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
40 MEHTA Sachin N. V V D V D V D 4.6 4 -0.6
41 MCBRIDE Jackson R. D V V V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
42 HUSSAIN Faaris D V V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
43 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo V V D D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
44 SAKHAMURI Surya D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
45 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V V V V D D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
46 GREENBAUM Maxwell H. D V D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
47 CZAHA Balint V V D V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
48 ZHOU Kevin V V D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
49 POPE Nico V D V V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
50 KIM Avery J. D D V D V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
51 FENG Leo D V D V V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
52 NI AMEN Zahir K. D D V V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
53 LI Joshua L. D V V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
54 ZUBATIY Samuel D V D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
55 BASALYGA Jeffrey D V D V V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
56 ERACHSHAW Taras P. D D V D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
57 LIN John A. V V D D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
58 KAYDALIN Artyom D D V D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
59 RIVERA Inigo Franco D V V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
60 SOHN Kevin J. D D D V D V V D 3.9 2 -1.9
61 ALTIRS Alexander D D D V V D V D 2.0 2 -
62 HONG Steven V V D D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
63 LIU kelly D V D D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
64 REYES Xavier M. D D D V D V D 2.3 1 -1.3
65 HOLZ William A. V V V D D V D 1.5 4 +2.5
66 KIM Andrew H. V V V V D D D 3.3 4 +0.7
67 FIELDS Matthew S. D D V V V V D 1.7 4 +2.3
68 DILLREE Spencer S. D V V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
69 GEFELL Andrew P. V D V V D D 3.0 3 -
70 LIM Ryan Y. V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
71 HAMMERSTROM Jared D V D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
72 BENAVRAM Lev C. V V D D V D D 4.3 3 -1.3
73 NG Jeremiah V V V D D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
74 BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. V D D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
74 DHINGRA Gian K. V V D V D D D 4.3 3 -1.3
76 CHAN Matthew V D V D V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
77 REN Richard D V V D D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
78 NOBLE Daniel D D V V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
79 NAZLYMOV Andrei D V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
80 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. D V V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
81 CHANG Eliot A. D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
82 JOHNSON Langston C. D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
83 REED Samuel J. V V D D D D 0.7 2 +1.3
84 CHEONG Heonjae D D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
85 HOUTZ Jackson D V D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
86 CHAMBERS Amir E. D V D D V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
87 SO Hananiah D D V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
87 LUO ZIRUI D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
89 MCCARTHY Gabriel V D D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
90 LINDHOLM Oliver S. D D V D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
91 SWORDS Evan F. V D D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
92 MAHONEY Colin M. V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
93 SHASHA zane V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
94 BERRIO Carter E. D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
95 ZENG Noah V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
96 MORRILL Justin D D V D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
97 PAN Andrew W. D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
97 RABINKOV Anthony D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
99 LIU Mingyang Ryan D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
100 GHAYALOD ansh D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
101 CHANG Colin S. V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
102 GRASS James D. D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
103 ESCUETA Tony V. D D V D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
104 DESHETLER Scott D V D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
105 BEITEL Noah V D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
106 OH Triton D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
107 FORT David D D D D V D 0.4 1 +0.6
108 LEITH Jack D V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
109 POSY Daniel D D D D V D 0.3 1 +0.7
110 WU Richard D D D D D V 0.3 1 +0.7
111 GOLD Jackson D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
112 WANG Nicolas D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
113 FLORES Peter D. D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
113 BALDWIN Michael B. D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
113 CHENG Albert D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
116 EDELMAN Seth A. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
117 BURDAN Gabriel D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
118 JANG Junhyuk D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.