Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Meilin | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 2 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
| 3 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 3 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
| 5 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 6 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% | |
| 7 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
| 8 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 9 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% |
| 10 | GU Emily | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 25% | |
| 12 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 14 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 2% | 20% | 51% | 26% | |
| 15 | LIU Sophia | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | ROY Layla | 1% | 9% | 41% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 18 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 45% | |
| 19 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 5% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
| 20 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 21% | 2% | |
| 21 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | YE Eileen | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 24 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 6% | 35% | 42% | 16% | 2% | |
| 25 | SEO Irene Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | MI Anning | 2% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 1% | 18% | 48% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 29 | YU Lauren C. | - | 2% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 5% | |
| 30 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 31 | CUI Amy | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 32 | SHA Yi Ling | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 34 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 10% | 59% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | WONG Sophia M. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 37 | MEI Sarah | 14% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | PAVE Claire | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 39 | MI Aileen | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | ZHOU Catherine | 29% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | CHARALEL Jessica | 16% | 43% | 33% | 7% | - | - | |
| 42 | ROHRING Anna | 48% | 44% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | XU Christine | - | < 1% | 4% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
| 44 | UNGERER Frieda | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 18% | 55% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | LEVY Avery | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | OTT Emily | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | YEUNG Natalie | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | LEE Kaitlyn | 31% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | ZARE Yasmin | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | WANG Reese | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.