America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 2 | JOHNSON Honor B. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 3 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 5 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 6 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 41% |
| 7 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 8 | PONICH Marissa | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | VARHELYI Kata | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 10 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 11 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 12 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 5% |
| 13 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 14 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 15 | TONG Kunling | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 16 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 18 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 19 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 20 | BOTELLO Natalia | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 21 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 22 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 23 | KONG Vera | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 24 | KIM Zoe | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 25 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 26 | LI Amanda C. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 3% |
| 27 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 30 | POTZ-NAGY Fanni | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 3% | |
| 31 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | STONE Hava S. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | JULIEN Michelle | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 34 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 35 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 36 | MIKA Veronica | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 38 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 39 | LIN Audrey J. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | TURNER Zoe Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 40 | FEARNS Zara A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 42 | LI Victoria J. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | KER Grace | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | TAO Hannah J. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | BLUM Leah I. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 47 | CHIOLDI Mina | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 48 | DUCKETT Madison | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
| 50 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 51 | BOIS Adele | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | WHANG Rebecca | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 53 | HILD Nisha | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LU Yi Lin | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | TUCKER Iman R. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 57 | KRASTEV Minna | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 58 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 60 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 61 | WU Zoe | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | VENTURA Eva | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | MARSEE Samantha | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 64 | OISHI Megumi | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 65 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 66 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 67 | HE Charlotte | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | KALRA Himani V. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 68 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 70 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 71 | WEI Vivian W. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | JUNG Irene | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 73 | TZOU Alexandra | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 74 | PAUL Lila | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 75 | SHEA Erin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 76 | PRIEUR Lauren | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 77 | VESTEL Mira B. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | SZETO Chloe | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 79 | LI Anna M. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 80 | CHEN Jane | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 82 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 83 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 84 | ATLURI Sara V. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 85 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 86 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 87 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 8% |
| 87 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 87 | DANK Dina | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 91 | GHAYALOD reya | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 91 | HURST Kennedy | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 93 | YODER Bridget H. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 95 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 96 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | CHIANG Emily | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | SAYLES Nina R. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 98 | CHANG Emily | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 100 | FANG Victoria W. | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 101 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 102 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 103 | LIU Sophie | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 104 | LEE Hannah | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 105 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 106 | THURGOOD Madison C. | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 107 | BILILIES Sophia | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 108 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 109 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 110 | YANG Ashley M. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 111 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 112 | HOLMES Emma | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 113 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | LU Amy | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | BAKER Audrey C. | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 116 | CODY Alexandra C. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 118 | DRAGON Rainer | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 119 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 119 | NEIBART Fiona | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | CHEN Xinyan | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 123 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 124 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | XI Shining | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 126 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 24% | 51% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 127 | SINHA Anika | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 128 | GLUCK Myriam | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.