The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

October NAC

Cadet Women's Saber

Monday, November 1, 2021 at 8:00 AM

America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.9 6 +0.1
2 LEE Alexandra B. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
3 POSSICK Lola P. V V D V V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
3 ANDRES Katherine A. V D V V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
5 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
6 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. D V V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
7 LI Amanda C. V V V V D V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
8 GORMAN Victoria M. V V V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
9 YANG Ashley M. V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
10 DUCKETT Madison V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
11 YUAN Greta V V V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
12 KRASTEV Minna V D V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
13 HILD Nisha D V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
14 SZETO Chloe V V D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
15 CALLAHAN Chase J. D V D V V V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
16 WIGGERS Susan Q. D V D V V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
17 KER Grace V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
18 ANDRES Charmaine G. V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
19 MARSEE Samantha V D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
20 JULIEN Michelle V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
21 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V V V D V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
22 LIN Audrey J. V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
23 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. D V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
24 NYSTROM Sofia C. D V V V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
25 MIKA Veronica V V D D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
26 BLUM Leah I. V V D V V D V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
26 BOIS Adele V V D V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
28 SHI Cathleen D V V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
29 JUNG Irene V V V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
30 FANG Victoria W. V V V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
31 VADASZ Ibla P. D V D V D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
32 LIU Sophie D V D V D V V V D 3.0 3 -
33 CHIOLDI Mina V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
34 LEE Sophia V V V V D V D 2.8 5 +2.2
35 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. V D V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
36 PAUL Lila V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
36 LU Amy V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
38 DANK Dina V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
39 CODY Alexandra C. D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
40 BALAKUMARAN Maya V D V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 FREEDMAN Janna N. D V D V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
42 LUKER Sophia V V D V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
43 BEVACQUA Aria F. D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
44 HWANG Gabriela M. V D V V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
45 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. D V V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
46 HOLMES Emma V D D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
47 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika D V D V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
48 CHEN Xinyan V V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
49 SADOVA Olga D D V V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
50 TSE Angelina D V V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
51 ERIKSON Kira R. D D D V V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
52 YANG Lea D D V V D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
53 NATH Trisha V D D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
54 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
54 TABANGAY Heartlyn D D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
56 LEE Hannah V D D V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
57 TSUI Natalie V D D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
58 KIM Marley I. V V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
59 LU Elaine V D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
60 XIAO julie V D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
61 NATHANSON Sammy E. V V D D D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
62 GRAFF Sophie D D D V V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
63 PENG Florella D V D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
64 SO Catelyn D V D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
65 GOMERMAN Sophia V D V D V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
66 CHIN Elise D V D V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
67 LIGH Erenei J. V D V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
68 ENDO Miyuki N. V D V D D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
69 BUHAY Rachel T. V V V D D D D 4.0 3 -1.0
70 WU Helen V V D D D V D 3.0 3 -
71 BARNOVITZ Maya V D V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
72 PRIEUR Lauren D D V V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
73 ANTHONY Alexia B. D D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
74 MAKLIN Sofia D V V D V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
75 HURST Kennedy D V V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
76 MCKEE Ainsley V D D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
77 ZOLLER Noelle V D V D D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
78 ZHANG Sophie D D V V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
79 LOPEZ-ONA Mia D V D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
80 HE Lizbeth V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
81 GHAYALOD reya D V V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
82 ALCEBAR Kayla V D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
83 FESTA Carina D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
84 NAYAK Esha D D D V V D 0.8 2 +1.2
85 CHIANG Emily V D D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
86 MARYASH Samantha V D D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 LIU Sydney D D V D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
86 KHAN Alissa V V D D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
89 GRULICH Rayaana D V V D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
89 WEI Vivian W. D V D D V D D 3.6 2 -1.6
89 NGUYEN Ella V V D D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
92 HUNG Anna D V D D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
93 JENKINS Scotland D D D V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
94 CHANG Audrey D V D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
95 HENRY Soraya S. V D V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
96 HUAI Delilah D D V V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
97 NAGORNAYA Uliana D D V V D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
98 SINHA Anika D D V D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
99 KANTIPUDI Shrika D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
100 HU Michelle V D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
101 BUHAY Kirsten M. D V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
101 LIM Jaslene D D D D V D D 0.9 1 +0.1
103 CHEN Ashley D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
104 SPRINGER Ella D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
105 RAMIREZ Mirka A. D D D D D V 1.9 1 -0.9
106 DENG Brooke D D D D D V 2.0 1 -1.0
107 ELNATAN Mica A. V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
108 CHEN Kevy D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
109 BAWA Anahat D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
110 DONG Angel D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
111 CHO Michelle D D D D V D 0.4 1 +0.6
112 PAL Anjali G. V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
113 DAI Olivia D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
114 LIN Nicole D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
115 JEONG Katie D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
115 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
117 NAYAK Anika D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
118 NICHOLAS Eva D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
118 GOLOVITSER Maya D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
120 GOMES Diana C. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
121 KOKAL Genevieve D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
122 ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
123 GUTHIKONDA Sunanya D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.