October NAC

Y-14 Women's Épée

Monday, November 1, 2021 at 12:30 PM

America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GAJJALA Sharika R. - - - 5% 23% 44% 28%
2 XIAO Ruien - - 1% 8% 27% 43% 21%
3 YU Nicole J. - - 5% 23% 40% 26% 6%
3 FURMAN Maria - 3% 12% 27% 33% 20% 5%
5 ZIGALO Elizabeth - - - 2% 13% 39% 46%
6 XUAN Nicole J. - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
7 HAFEEZ Hiba - 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 5%
8 YIN Julia - - 4% 21% 43% 31%
9 REID Anousheh - - 2% 9% 26% 40% 23%
10 FENG ge - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
11 KIM Zoe L. - - - 3% 17% 42% 37%
12 LIN Elaine - 1% 6% 20% 34% 29% 9%
13 KIM Jayna - 3% 15% 31% 33% 16% 2%
14 SHARMA Sanvi 2% 11% 28% 34% 21% 5%
15 JAKEL Alysa C. 1% 9% 30% 38% 18% 4% -
16 YAO Melinda - 5% 18% 34% 32% 12%
17 ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika - 6% 23% 39% 26% 5%
18 LEE REGINA - 1% 8% 23% 34% 26% 8%
19 SPRINGER Sierra 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 7% 1%
20 NGUYEN Tallulah - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 26%
21 SHIV Avni - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
22 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
23 WATTANAKIT Anda 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
24 ZHENG Linden 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
25 NEMETH Katherine - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
26 GUJJA Misha - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 2%
27 ZHU Serene M. - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 4%
28 MALLAVARPU saanvi 3% 16% 31% 30% 15% 4% -
29 ELSTON Sophia - 2% 14% 35% 37% 12%
30 LEE Natasha - - 2% 13% 34% 39% 12%
31 BUSH emma - 4% 18% 33% 30% 12% 2%
32 CHI Chelsea 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
33 KORFONTA Jolie - - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
34 ZHANG Victoria R. - - 2% 9% 28% 40% 21%
35 HAFEEZ Hania - - 2% 11% 31% 38% 17%
35 AZMEH nour - 3% 15% 30% 32% 16% 3%
37 SENYUVA Su - 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2%
38 PARK Judy - 8% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
39 RANDLEMAN Teresa - 1% 7% 21% 34% 27% 9%
40 PHUKAN Indra 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
41 SMUK Alexandra S. 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
42 YANG Alisa - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
43 YOU Emily 4% 20% 34% 28% 12% 2%
44 CANNING Charlotte 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1%
45 BECKMAN Ana 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 8% 1%
46 KUKVA Taisiya - 4% 15% 30% 31% 17% 4%
47 WITTER Catherine A. - 4% 16% 31% 31% 14% 3%
48 XU Katelyn 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
49 LEE Olivia 1% 11% 33% 37% 16% 3% -
50 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. 1% 6% 20% 32% 27% 11% 2%
51 LEE Rachel 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 3%
52 HAYNES Antonia 5% 27% 40% 23% 5% -
53 WANG Ziqi 6% 30% 39% 20% 4% -
54 QI Jarynne Valerie - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
55 MUELLER Emma M. - 3% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5%
56 MUN Brianna K. - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
57 BARCLAY Khyri 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
57 BEZUGLAYA Varvara 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
59 CHOI Grace 1% 7% 22% 32% 26% 10% 2%
60 JOSHI Aanika 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
61 DAHER Yasmine 10% 32% 35% 18% 5% 1% -
62 LI Zhenni (Jenny) 4% 19% 33% 28% 13% 3% -
63 LEE Camilla 7% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
64 SMOTRITSKY Liat 43% 40% 14% 2% - - -
65 PINNAMANENI Drithi 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
66 SU Evelyn - 3% 13% 29% 33% 18% 4%
67 PULLEN Ayah 3% 18% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
68 FAN Elizabeth 5% 21% 34% 28% 11% 2%
69 NGUYEN Jolie T. 1% 9% 24% 32% 24% 9% 1%
70 LIU Nicole 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
71 WANG Angelina 2% 20% 38% 29% 10% 2% -
72 GEVA Eliana 7% 25% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
73 NIX Reagan 8% 28% 35% 21% 7% 1% -
74 MIRZA Annoshae 17% 37% 31% 13% 3% - -
75 XU Bonnie Jia Li 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
75 GUO Luxi 29% 46% 21% 4% - - -
77 TYTELL Elizabeth 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
78 KOVALCHUK Erika S. 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% -
79 NELSON Grace E. 15% 35% 33% 14% 3% - -
79 KUMAR Eva 4% 20% 36% 28% 11% 2% -
81 CARRIER Meredith 21% 38% 28% 11% 2% - -
82 LIU Baihan 13% 32% 32% 17% 5% 1% -
83 WANG Victoria 20% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
84 SYKES Elynor 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% 1% -
85 IYER Ishana 28% 47% 21% 4% - - -
86 FREEMAN Kate 45% 40% 13% 2% - -
87 MCKENNA Analise 42% 40% 15% 3% - - -
88 LIN Ariel 31% 43% 21% 5% 1% - -
89 PETROFF Gabrielle 78% 20% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.